Questioning Planning, Connecting Places and Times: Introduction to the Special Issue
Author:
Simone Tulumello and Patsy Healey
Title:
Questioning Planning, Connecting Places and Times: Introduction to the Special Issue
ISSN Code:
2468-0648
DOI Code:
10.24306/plnxt.2016.03.001
Journal:
PlaNext
Edition:
Volume 3 | December 2016 | 7 - 15

Let us open this editorial introduction in an unusual way, made possible by plaNext’s innovative approach to peer-review. Let us quote a paragraph from one of the reviews to the articles of this issue, namely the review by Marco Allegra to Ignacio Castillo Ulloa’s article.

One might suspect that this is a simplistic account of the functioning of the planning process: planners, after all, might be creative in their work; take risks (or not); simply rely on their professional expertise, but also use it in a strategic way to negotiate their role in the policy process; display a number of alternative, ‘non-planning strategies’; follow a private, particularistic or political agenda (rather than planning handbooks) in doing their job; cheat, lie, manipulate their clients, colleagues or the stakeholders in general. In sum, what the author presents as a dispute between two irreconcilable logics – between the rational, positivistic planner and the hysteric residents – might be part of a broader interaction between a ‘planner- actor’ and all the other participants to the planning process