place development of undefined becoming in south-west Sweden
Downloads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/81Keywords:
place development, uncertainty, post-structuralism, SwedenAbstract
There is increasing awareness in the planning community of the need for planning methods that can work with the complex and uncertain issues that characterise contemporary planning contexts. Through a case study of platsutveckling [place development] in south-west Sweden, this paper explores the potential of a post-structuralist planning perspective as one way forward in approaching uncertainty and complexity in planning. Platsutveckling is an approach to place development planning in the context of regional development, implemented by the Swedish regional government Västra Götalandsregionen (VGR). Place development initiatives in VGR incorporate a participatory approach, actively involving local stakeholders to develop target place visions. The platsutveckling process also has characteristics of structuralist planning methods, with a strong emphasis on goal setting. The case is used to argue that a mindset shift is required in order to move forward with planning with uncertainty. Conceptualising uncertainty-as-opportunity, the paper applies a post-structuralist planning perspective to the case study to consider how planning could respond in contexts with high levels of self-organisation. The paper concludes with a discussion of the potential of a post-structuralist approach in complex and uncertain planning contexts.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Rebecca Staats
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Allmendinger, P. (2017). Planning Theory. Third Edition. London: Palgrave.
Amin, A. (2016 [2011]). Urban Planning in an Uncertain World. In S. Fainstein and J. DeFilippis (Ed.) Readings in Planning Theory Fourth Edition (pp.156–168). Chichester: Wiley.
Balducci, A., Boelens, L., Hillier, J., Nyseth, T., & Wilkinson, C. (2011). Introduction: Strategic spatial planning in uncertainty: theory and exploratory practice. The Town Planning Review. 82(5): 481-501. http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.ub.gu.se/10.3828/tpr.2011.29
Björling, N., & Ohlén, B. (2018). Hållbar Platsutveckling: Kunskapsöversikt Västra Götaland. Mistra Urban Futures Report 2018:3.
Boelens L., & de Roo, G. (2016). Planning of undefined becoming: First encounters of planners beyond the plan. Planning Theory. 15(1): 42-67. https://doi-org.ezproxy.ub.gu.se/10.1177/1473095214542631
Boonstra, B., & Rauws, W. (2021). Ontological diversity in urban self-organization: Complexity, critical realism and post-structuralism. Planning Theory. 20(4): 303-324. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095221992392
Byrne, D. (2003). Complexity Theory and Planning Theory: A Necessary Encounter. Planning Theory. 2(3): 171-178. https://doi-org.ezproxy.ub.gu.se/10.1177/147309520323002
Flyvberg, B. (2006) Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry. 12(2): 219-245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363
King, B. (2008). Strategizing at Leading Venture Capital Firms: of Planning, Opportunism and Deliberate Emergence. Long Range Planning. 41(3): 345-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2008.03.006
May, S., & Holtorf, C. (2020a). Uncertain futures. In R. Harrison, C. Desilvey, C. Holtorf, S. Macdonald, N. Bartolini, E. Breithoff, H. Fredheim, A. Lyons, S. May, J. Morgan, & S. Penrose (Ed.) Heritage Futures: Comparative Approaches to Natural and Cultural Heritage Practices (pp. 263-275). London: UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781787356009
May, S., & Holtorf, C. (2020b). Uncertainy, collaboration and emerging issues. In R. Harrison, C. Desilvey, C. Holtorf, S. Macdonald, N. Bartolini, E. Breithoff, H. Fredheim, A. Lyons, S. May, J. Morgan, & S. Penrose (Ed.) Heritage Futures: Comparative Approaches to Natural and Cultural Heritage Practices (pp. 336-343). London: UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781787356009
Matejova, M., & Briggs, C. (2021). Embracing the Darkness: Methods for Tackling Uncertainty and Complexity in Environmental Disaster Risks. Global Environmental Politics. 21(1): 76-88. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00591
Mintzberg, H. (2000 [1994]). The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning. London: Prentice Hall.
Mintzberg, H., & Waters, J. (1985). Of Strategies, Deliberate and Emergent. Strategic Management Journal. 6(3): 257-272. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250060306.
Ragin, C. (1987). The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley; Los Angeles; London: University of California Press.
Rauws, W., de Roo, G., & Zhang, S. (2016). Self-organisation and spatial planning: an editorial introduction. The Town Planning Review. 87(3): 241-251. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2016.18
Salet, W., Bertolini, L., & Giezen, M. (2013). Complexity and Uncertainty: Problem or Asset in Decision Making of Mega Infrastructure Projects?. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37(6): 1984-2000. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01133.x
Statistikmyndigheten SCB (2021) Folkmängd per tätort efter region och vart 5:e år. Updated 2021-11-24. Statistikmyndigheten Sverige. Retrieved December 10, 2021, from: https://www.statistikdatabasen.scb.se/pxweb/sv/ssd/START__MI__MI0810__MI0810A/LandarealTatortN/table/tableViewLayout1/
Wachs, M. (2016 [2013]). The Past, Present, and Future of Professional Ethics in Planning. In S. Fainstein and J. DeFilippis (Ed.) Readings in Planning Theory Fourth Edition (pp. 464–479). Chichester: Wiley.
Winkler, J. (2016). Embracing Complexity and Uncertainty. Annnals of the American Association of Geographers. 106(6): 1418-1433. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2016.1207973
Zwikael, O., & Ahn, M. (2011). The Effectiveness of Risk Management: An Analysis of Project Risk Planning Across Industries and Countries. Risk Analysis: An International Journal. 31(1): 25-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01470.x
