Rooting metropolitan planning in critical theory and participatory practices

A university planning experience in Belo Horizonte, Brazil





metropolitan planning, critical theory, participatory practices, Belo Horizonte, Brazil


The paper aims at contributing to the discussion about planning theory and participatory practices in the Global South by focusing on a planning experience for the Belo Horizonte Metropolitan Region, Minas Gerais State, Brazil, led by faculty, researchers and students at the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, between 2009 and 2019. The initiative unveils the University autonomy in designing and carrying out the metropolitan analyses and planning proposals, in adopting theoretical principles and methodologies and, in developing an outreach programme tightly linked to education and research, resulting in significant improvements in planning education, innovations in planning methodology and the potential for rooting radical planning practices in the metropolitan context. First, objects and subjects of the experience are introduced, together with the three phases of the process: the drafting of a metropolitan plan known as the Integrated Development Master Plan for the RMBH; the Metropolitan Macro-Zoning; and the review of municipal Master Plans within RMBH. Secondly, the trajectory and influences of Brazilian urban and metropolitan planning are reviewed to the extent that they fed into the experience. The discussion of municipal planning processes leads to an assessment of the experience’s main achievements. The concluding section offers some thoughts on rooting metropolitan and urban planning in critical theory and participatory practices, as a means to contribute to discussions of planning practices in the Global South.




Acselrad, H., & Coli, L.R. (2008). Disputas territoriais e disputas cartográficas. In H. Acselrad (Ed.), Cartografias sociais e território (pp.13-43). Rio de Janeiro: IPPUR/UFRJ.

Brenner, N., & Elden, S. (Eds) (2009). State, space, world: Selected essays by Henri Lefebvre. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Costa, G.M., Costa, H.S.M., Dias, J.B., & Welter, M. (2009). The role of municipal committees in the development of an integrated urban water policy in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Water Science and Technology, 60: 3129-3136. DOI: 10.2166/wst.2009.742.

Costa, H.S.M. (2011). Urban politics and planning in the periphery: The challenges of reinventing metropolitan planning in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. In World Planning Schools Congress. WPSC 2011 – Planning´s Future – Futures Planning: Planning in an era of global (un)certainty and transformation (pp. 1-15). Perth: The University of Western Australia.

Costa, H.S.M., & Costa, G.M. (2007). Between planning practice and the academic world: Some comments from a Brazilian experience. Planning Theory and Practice, 8: 383-412.

Costa, H.S.M., Costa, G.M., Mendonça, J.M., & Monte-Mór, R.L.M. (Eds) (2006). Novas periferias metropolitanas. A expansão metropolitana de Belo Horizonte: dinâmica e especificidades no Eixo Sul. Belo Horizonte: Editora C/Arte.

Davis, M. (2007). Planet of slums. London: Verso.

Fainstein, S. (1997). Justice, politics and the creation of urban space. In A. Merrifield & E. Swyngedouw (Eds), The urbanization of injustice (pp. 18-44). New York: New York University Press.

Fainstein, S., & Defilippis, J. (2016). Introduction: The structure and debates of planning theory. In S. Fainstein & J.Defilippis (Eds), Readings in planning theory (pp. 1-18).Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley/Blackwell.

Fernandes, E. (2013). Estatuto da Cidade, mais de dez anos depois. Revista da UFMG, 20(1): 212-234.

Friedmann, J. (1987). Planning in the public domain: From knowledge to action. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Holston, J. (2008). Insurgent citizenship: Disjunctions of democracy and modernity in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Kofman, E., &Lebas, E. (Eds) (1996). Writings on cities: Henri Lefebvre. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

Lefebvre, H. (1979). Space: social product and use value. In J.W. Freiberg (Ed.), Critical sociology: European perspective (pp. 285-295). New York: Halsted Press.

Lefebvre, H. (1993). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.

Lefebvre, H. (2003). The urban revolution. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Lefebvre, H. (2015). Dissolving city, planetary metamorphosis. In N. Brenner (Ed.), Implosions/Explosions: Towards a study of planetary urbanization (pp. 566-570). Berlin: Jovis.

Maricato, E. (2000). As idéias fora do lugar e o lugar fora das idéias. In O. Arantes, C. Vainer, & E. Maricato, A cidade do pensamento único (pp. 121-192). Petrópolis: Vozes.

Monte-Mór, R.L.M. (2009). Urbanicidade. Um compromisso necessário para a produção de um espaço metropolitano sustentável. Caderno Metropolitano I. A (re)construção da RMBH (pp. 10-18). Belo Horizonte: Sedru/CREA-MG.

Monte-Mór, R.L.M. (2019). Planejamento urbano no Brasil: emergência e consolidação. In E. Limonad (Ed.). etc espaço, tempo e crítica...(pp. 109-142). Rio de Janeiro: Letra Capital.

Monte-Mór, R.L.M., Costa, G.M., Costa, H.S.M., & Melo, M.G.P. (2016). The university and metropolitan planning: an innovative experience. Nova Economia, 26: 1133-1156.

Nobre, M. (2004). A teoria crítica. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar.

Oliveira, F.L., Cardoso, A.L., Costa, H.S.M., & Vainer, C.B. (2012). Grandes projetos metropolitanos. Rio de Janeiro e Belo Horizonte. Rio de Janeiro: Letra Capital.

Santos, M. (2000). Território e sociedade. São Paulo: Editora Fundação Perseu Abramo.

Sousa Santos, B. (2003). Introdução a uma ciência pós-moderna. Rio de Janeiro: Graal.

UFMG, PUCMinas, & UEMG (2011). Plano Diretor de Desenvolvimento Integrado da Região Metropolitana de Belo Horizonte – PDDI-RMBH. Belo Horizonte: UFMG, PUCMinas, & UEMG.

Watson, V. (2003). Conflicting rationalities: Implications for planning theory and ethics. Planning theory and practice, 4(4): 395-407. DOI:

Watson, V. (2009). Seeing from the South: Refocusing urban planning on the globe’s central urban issues. Urban studies, 46(11): 2259-2275. DOI: