Downloads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/96Keywords:
informality, tenure insecurity, urban planning, informal settlements, Buenos AiresAbstract
This paper analyses economic and tenure insecurities and risk of eviction in informal settlements and shantytowns in Buenos Aires, Argentina. It shows how the bottom-up planning initiatives led by community leaders and activists are often motivated by the fact that engagement with or imitation of formal planning regulations and codes increase the perceived tenure security in these settlements. If and when security from eviction is achieved, however, or when households who occupy these lands do not aspire to stay there in the long-term, planning efforts might be ignored or even rejected. In such situations they may refocus their priorities on livelihood strategies and saving.
This research was conducted as an ethnographic case study based on physical and digital fieldworks. The findings urge urban planners to pay more attention to the way in which mainstream planning approaches magnify existing and create new insecurities and informalities, instead of addressing them. Planners need to recognise the gaps between their planning ambitions, and the realities and priorities of people living in informal settlements and shantytowns in situations where the state is unable to ensure access to affordable housing.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Marcin Wojciech Sliwa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Abramo, P. (2012). La ciudad com-fusa: Mercado y producción de la estructura urbana en las grandes metrópolis latinoamericanas. EURE (Santiago), 38(114), 35–69.
AlSayyad, N. (2004). Urban informality as a ‘new’ way of life. In A. Roy & N. AlSayyad (Eds.), Urban informality: Transnational perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia (pp. 7–30). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Altrock, U. (2012). Conceptualising informality: Some thoughts on the way towards generalisation. In C. McFarlane & M. Waibel (Eds.), Urban informalities: Reflections on the formal and informal (pp. 171–194). Farnham: Ashgate.
Arnold, P., Díaz, J., & Algoed, L. (2020). Collective land tenure in Latin America and the Caribbean, past and present. In J. E. Davis, L. Algoed, & M. E. Hernández-Torrales (Eds.), On common ground: International perspectives on the community land trust (pp. 167–188). Madison, WI: Terra Nostra Press.
Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. B. (2013). Process-tracing methods: Foundations and guidelines. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Bhan, G. (2009). ‘This is no longer the city I once knew’. Evictions, the urban poor and the right to the city in millennial Delhi. Environment and Urbanization, 21(1), 127–142.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2008). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Bredenoord, J., & van Lindert, P. (2010). Pro-poor housing policies: Rethinking the potential of assisted self-help housing. Habitat International, 34(3), 278–287.
Buckley, R. M., & Kalarickal, J. (Eds.). (2006). Thirty years of World Bank shelter lending: What have we learned? Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
Burgess, R. (1978). Petty commodity housing or dweller control? A critique of John Turner's views on housing policy. World Development, 6(9–10), 1105–1133.
Cutts, A., & Moser, S. (2015). State-community collaborative strategies to enable the right to the city in Argentina. Habitat International, 49, 243–250.
Davis, D. E., & Fernández, J. C. (2020). Collective property rights and social citizenship: Recent trends in urban Latin America. Social Policy and Society, 19(2), 319–330.
Davoudi, S. (2015). Planning as practice of knowing. Planning Theory, 14(3), 316–331.
Deininger, K. (2003). Land policies for growth and poverty reduction. Washington, D.C.: World Bank / Oxford University Press.
de Paula, A. F., Morales, M., & Grandín, E. (Eds.). (2010). Por una tierra nuestra: Los caminos en la lucha por la tierra (2nd ed.). Buenos Aires: Asociación Civil Madre Tierra.
de Soto, H. (2001). The mystery of capital: Why capitalism triumphs in the West and fails everywhere else. London: Black Swan.
de Souza, M. L. (2006). Social movements as ‘critical urban planning’ agents. City, 10(3), 327–342.
Dowling, R. (2010). Power, subjectivity and ethics in qualitative research. In I. Hay (Ed.), Qualitative research methods in human geography (pp. 26–39). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Duneier, M., Kasinitz, P., & Murphy, A. (Eds.). (2014). The urban ethnography reader. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Echavarria, A., Agrawal, M., & Hebbert, M. (2021). Planning and development standards: Challenges for planning with informality in the Global South. In C. Mukhopadhyay, C. Belingardi, G. Pappalardo, & M. Hendawy (Eds.), Special issue: Planning practices and theories from the Global South (pp. 16–21). Conversations in planning theory and practice booklet project. Dortmund: Association of European School of Planning – Young Academic Network.
Fife, W. (2005). Doing fieldwork: Ethnographic methods for research in developing countries and beyond. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.
Gilbert, A. (2002). On the mystery of capital and the myths of Hernando de Soto: What difference does legal title make? International Development Planning Review, 24(1), 1–19.
Gilbert, A. (2005). Sustaining urban development in Latin America in an unpredictable world. In M. Keiner, M. Koll-Schretzenmayr, & W. A. Schmid (Eds.), Managing urban futures (pp. 37–46). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Gilbert, A. (2007). The return of the slum: Does language matter? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(4), 697–713.
Gilbert, A. (2019). Slums and shanties. In A. M. Orum (Ed.), The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of urban and regional studies. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
Gilbert, A., & Ward, P. M. (1985). Housing, the state and the poor: Policy and practice in three Latin American cities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Greene, M., & Rojas, E. (2008). Incremental construction: A strategy to facilitate access to housing. Environment and Urbanization, 20(1), 89–108.
Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (2008). Narrative ethnography. In S. N. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 241–264). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Habraken, N. J. (1998). The structure of the ordinary: Form and control in the built environment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hamdi, N. (2004). Small change: About the art of practice and the limits of planning in cities. London: Earthscan.
Hamdi, N. (2010). The placemaker's guide to building community. London: Earthscan.
Harvey, D. (2013). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. London: Verso.
Hernández, F., Kellett, P., & Allen, L. K. (Eds.). (2010). Rethinking the informal city: Critical perspectives from Latin America. New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
Holston, J. (2009). Insurgent citizenship in an era of global urban peripheries. City & Society, 21(2), 245–267.
Irwin, S. (2010). Data analysis and interpretation: Emergent issues in linking qualitative and quantitative evidence. In S. N. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 415–435). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Jordhus-Lier, D., Braathen, E., Dupont, V., & Sutherland, C. (2015). Knowledge and power in upgrading and resettlement initiatives. In V. Dupont, D. Jordhus-Lier, C. Sutherland, & E. Braathen (Eds.), The politics of slums in the Global South (pp. 115–143). Routledge.
Kaika, M. (2017). ‘Don’t call me resilient again!’: The New Urban Agenda as immunology … or … what happens when communities refuse to be vaccinated with ‘smart cities’ and indicators. Environment and Urbanization, 29(1), 89–102.
Kamalipour, H., & Peimani, N. (2021). Informal urbanism in the state of uncertainty: Forms of informality and urban health emergencies. Urban Design International, 26, 122–134.
Lees, L., Shin, H. B., & López-Morales, E. (2016). Planetary gentrification. Cambridge: Polity.
Maxwell, J. A., & Miller, B. A. (2010). Categorizing and connecting strategies in qualitative data analysis. In S. N. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 461–477). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
McLeod, R. (2001). Costs associated with accessing legal shelter for low-income groups in new urban developments. In Regulatory frameworks for affordable shelter project. Geoffrey Payne and Associates.
Mehrotra, R., Vera, F., & Mayoral, J. (Eds.). (2017). Ephemeral urbanism: Does permanence matter? ListLab.
Miraftab, F. (2009). Insurgent planning: Situating radical planning in the Global South. Planning Theory, 8(1), 32–50.
Mitlin, D., & Bartlett, S. (2018). Co-production in cities: Providing services, empowering communities, changing relationships. Environment and Urbanization, 30(2), 1–6.
Muñoz, S. (2018). Urban precarity and home: There is no ‘Right to the City’. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 108(2), 370–379.
Ortiz Flores, E. (2012). Producción social de la vivienda y el hábitat. Bases conceptuales y correlación con los procesos habitacionales. Mexico: Habitat International Coalition–América Latina (HIC–AL).
Payne, G. (Ed.). (2002). Land, rights, and innovation: Improving tenure security for the urban poor. London: ITDG Publishing.
Payne, G., Durand-Lasserve, A., & Rakodi, C. (2009). The limits of land titling and home ownership. Environment and Urbanization, 21(2), 443–462.
Pelli, V. S. (1994). Autoconstrucción: El camino hacia la gestión participativa y concertada del hábitat. In V. S. Pelli, M. Lugo, G. Romero, & T. Bolívar (Eds.), Reflexiones sobre la autoconstrucción del hábitat popular en América Latina (pp. 9–40). Universidad Nacional del Nordeste.
Pels, P., & Salemink, O. (1994). Introduction: Five theses on ethnography as colonial practice. History and Anthropology, 8(1–4), 1–34.
Pradilla, E. (1983). El problema de la vivienda en América Latina. Quito: Centro de Investigaciones CIUDAD.
Putnam, R. (2001). Social capital: Measurement and consequences. Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2, 41–51.
Rodríguez, M. C. (Ed.). (2021). Hábitat, autogestión y horizonte socialista: Construyendo con y sin ladrillos la nueva sociedad. Buenos Aires: Editorial El Colectivo.
Rolnik, R. (2014). Place, inhabitance and citizenship: The right to housing and the right to the city in the contemporary urban world. International Journal of Housing Policy, 14(3), 293–300.
Roy, A. (2005). Urban informality: Toward an epistemology of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2), 147–158.
Roy, A. (2009). Why India cannot plan its cities: Informality, insurgence and the idiom of urbanization. Planning Theory, 8(1), 76–87.
Ryan-Collins, J., Lloyd, T., & Macfarlane, L. (2017). Rethinking the economics of land and housing. London: Zed Books.
Sanyal, B. (n.d.). Social norms and formal rules: How they influenced housing delivery for the urban poor in developing countries. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Satterthwaite, D. (2020). Getting housing back onto the development agenda: The many roles of housing and the many services it should provide its inhabitants. Environment and Urbanization, 32(1), 3–18.
Sennett, R., Burdett, R., & Sassen, S. (Eds.). (2018). The Quito Papers and the New Urban Agenda. New York: Routledge.
Sette Whitaker Ferreira, J. S., Rojas, E., & de Souza Carvalho, H. R. (2020). Housing policies and the roles of local governments in Latin America: Recent experiences. Environment and Urbanization, 32(2), 333–350.
Shrestha, P., & Aranya, R. (2015). Claiming invited and invented spaces: Contingencies for insurgent planning practices. International Planning Studies, 20(4), 424–443.
Turner, J. F. C. (1972). Housing as a verb. In J. F. C. Turner & R. Fichter (Eds.), Freedom to build (pp. 148–175). New York: Macmillan.
Turner, J. F. C. (1976). Housing by people: Towards autonomy in building environments. London: Marion Boyars.
UNDP. (2022). Human development report 2021/2022: Uncertain times, unsettled lives: Shaping our future in a transforming world. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
UN-Habitat. (2015). Land tenure security in selected countries: Global report. Securing land and property rights for all. Nairobi: United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat).
UN-Habitat. (2022). World Cities Report 2022: Envisaging the Future of Cities. United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat).
UN-Habitat & OHCHR. (2009). The right to adequate housing (Fact Sheet No. 21/Rev.1 ed.). Geneva: United Nations.
Ward, P. M., Jiménez Huerta, E. R., & Di Virgilio, M. (Eds.). (2015). Housing policy in Latin American cities: A new generation of strategies and approaches for 2016 UN-Habitat III. New York, NY: Routledge.
Watson, V. (2002). Do we learn from planning practice? The contribution of the practice movement to planning theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22(2), 178–187.
Watson, V. (2003). Conflicting rationalities: Implications for planning theory and ethics. Planning Theory & Practice, 4(4), 395–407.
Watson, V. (2009). Seeing from the South: Refocusing urban planning on the globe’s central urban issues. Urban Studies, 46(11), 2259–2275.
Wily, L. A. (2018). Collective land ownership in the 21st century: Overview of global trends. Land, 7(68), 1–26.
van Lindert, P. (2016). Rethinking urban development in Latin America: A review of changing paradigms and policies. Habitat International, 54(3), 253–264.
Varley, A. (2002). Private or public: Debating the meaning of tenure legislation. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(3), 449–461.
Yiftachel, O. (2009). Critical theory and ‘gray space’: Mobilization of the colonized. City, 13(2–3), 246–263.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. London: SAGE.
