Hernando de Soto on land titling:

Consensus and criticism

Authors

Downloads

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt.2016.03.003

Keywords:

informality, property rights, extra-legality, poverty reduction

Abstract

The proliferation of informal settlements is one of the most relevant consequences of the urbanization process that has been affecting most of the cities in the Global South. Among the different ways to cope with this issue, the regularization of informal settlements through land titling has been one of the main shared strategies that scholars and policy makers have focused on for the last twenty years. A relevant and well-known contribution concerning this issue is the one provided by the Peruvian economist Hernando de Soto. Defined together, one of the best economists in the world, and the ‘guru of neo-liberal populism’, de Soto attracts both important endorsements and harsh criticisms for his theories. The contribution of this paper is to provide a detailed framework of de Soto main achievements, in terms of his current institutional influence and the international impact of his ideas, in contraposition with an analysis of the most relevant critiques developed against his theories.

Published

2016-12-01

References

Balbo, M. (2014). Beyond the city of developing countries. The new urban order of the ‘emerging city’. Planning Theory. 13 (3): 269-286.

Benda-Beckmann, F. (2003). Mysteries of capital or mystification of legal property? Focaal- European Journal of Anthropology. 41: 187-191.

Bromley, R. (2004). Power, property, and poverty: Why de Soto’s ‘Mystery of capital’ cannot be solved? In A. Roy & N. AlSayyad (Eds.), Urban informality: Transnational perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia (pp. 271-288). New York, NY: Lexington Books.

Bromley, D.W. (2008). Formalising property relations in the developing world: The wrong prescription for the wrong malady. Land Use Policy. 26: 20-27.

Bruce, J. (2006). Reform of land law in the context of World Bank lending. In J. Bruce, R. Mitchell, R.

Giovarelli, L. Rolfes & D. Bledsoe (Eds.), Land law reform (pp. 11-64). Washington, DC: World Bank.

Buckley, R. & Kalarickal, J. (Eds.) (2006). Thirty years of World Bank shelter lending: What have we learned? Washington, DC: World Bank.

Calderon, J. (2007). Después de la formalizacion ¿Qué sigue? Paper presented at the World Bank Urban Research Symposium, Washington, May. Retrieved 08 November 2016 from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTURBANDEVELOPMENT/Resources/336387-1269364687916/6892589-1269394475210/calderon.pdf.

Calderon, J. (2010). Titulacion de la propriedad y mercado inmobiliario. Estudios Demograficos y Urbanos. 25(3): 625-661.

Calderon, J. (2011). Titulacion de la propriedad y mercado de tierras. EURE. Revista de Estudios Urbano Regionales. 37(111): 47-77.

CLEP (Commision on Legal Empowerment of the Poor) (2008). Making the law work for everyone. New York, NY: The Commision on Legal Empowerment of the Poor.

CVR (Comisi n de la Verdad y Reconciliaci n) (2003). Enforme final de la Comisi n de la Verdad y Reconciliaci n. Retrieved 08 November 2016 from http://cverdad.org.pe/ifinal/.

Cousins, B., Cousins, T., Hornby, D., Kingwill, R., Royston, L. & Smit, W. (2005). Will formalising property rights reduce poverty in South Africa’s ‘second economy’? Questioning the Mythologies of Hernando de Soto. Programme for Land and Agrarian Studies Policy Brief. 18: 1-6.

Davis, M. (2006). Planet of slums. London: Verso.

de Soto, H. (1986). El otro sendero: La revolucion informal. Lima: Editorial El Barranco.

de Soto, H. (2000). The mystery of capital: Why capitalism triumphs in the West and fails everywhere else. New York, NY: Basic Books.

de Soto, H. (2001). The mistery of capital. Finance and Development. 38(1) [online].

de Soto, H. (2002a). The other path: The economic answer to terrorism. Washington, DC: Basic Books.

de Soto, H. (2002b). Law and property outside the West: A few new ideas about fighting poverty. Forum for Development Studies. 29(2): 349-361.

de Soto, H. (2004). Bringing capitalism to the masses. Cato’s Letter. 2: 1-6.

Durand-Lasserve, A., Fernandes, E., Payne, G., & Rakodi, C. (2007). Social and economic impacts of land titling programmes in urban and peri- urban areas: A review of the literature. March 2007. Retrieved 08 November 2016 from www.birmingham.ac.uk/Documents/college-social-sciences/government-society/idd/research/social-economic-impacts/social-economic-impacts-literature-review.pdf.

Durand-Lasserve, A. & Selod, H. (2007). The formalisation of urban land tenure in developing countries. Paper presented at the World Bank’s 2007 Urban Research Symposium, 14-16 May, Washington.

Earle, L. (2014). Stepping out of the twilight? Assessing the governance implications of land titling and regularization programmes. International journal of Urban and Regional Research. 38(2): 628-645.

Fernandes, E. (2002). The influence of de Soto’s The mistery of capital. Land Lines. 14(1): 5-8.

Fernandes, E. (2003). Programas de regularizacion de la tenencia de la tierra urbana y pobreza urbana en latinoamerica. Vivienda Popular. 12: 5-16.

Galiani, S., & Schargrodsky, E. (2010). Property rights for the poor: Effects of land titling. Journal of Public Economies. 94: 700-729.

Gilbert, A. (2002). On The mystery of capital and the myths of Hernando de Soto: What difference does legal title make? International Development Planning Review. 24(1): 1-19.

Gilbert, A. (2012). De Soto’s The mystery of capital: Reflections on the book’s public impact. International Development Planning Review. 34(3): v- xviii.

Gravois, J. (2005). The de Soto Delusion. Slate. 9 January.

Helmsing, A.H.J. (2002). Decentralisation, enablement, and local governance in low-income countries. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. 20(3): 317-340.

ILD (Instituto Libertad y Democracia) (2014). Impact. Retrieved 30 July 2014 from http://www.ild.org.pe/index.php/en/impact.

Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) (2006). Building opportunity for the majority. Washington, DC: IDB.

Kinsella, N.S. (2002). Book reviews. Hernando de Soto. The mystery of capital. Journal of Libertarian Studies. 16(1): 99-114.

McFarlane, C. (2012). The entrepreneurial slum: Civil society, mobility and co-production of urban development. Urban Studies. 49(13): 2795- 2816.

Obeng-Odoom, F. (2013). The mistery of capital or the mystification of capital? Review of Social Economy. 71(4): 427-442.

Otto, J.M. (2009). Rule of law promotion, land tenure and poverty alleviation: Questioning the assumption of Hernando de Soto. Hague Juornal on the Rule of Law. 1: 173-195.

P&DM (Graduate School of Public and Development Management) (2007). Are Hernando de Soto’s views appropriate to South Africa? Johannesbrug: Graduate School of Public and Development Management.

Panaritis, E. (2001). Do property rights matter? An urban case study from Peru. Global Outlook: International Urban Research Monitor. 1: 20-22.

Payne, G. (2008). Owning up: What price home ownership? Housing Finance International. December: 1-11.

Payne, G., Durand-Lasserve, A., & Rakodi, C. (2009). The limits of land titling and home ownership. Environment and Urbanization. 21(2): 443-462.

Rossini, R.G., & Thomas, J.J. (1990). The size of the informal sector in Peru: A critical comment on Hernando de Soto’s El otro sendero. World Development. 18(1): 125-135.

Rutten, M. (2009). Why de Soto’s land tenure ideas of formalized property rigths are failing to benefit the Africa’s poor. African Studies Centre Netherlands. Info Sheet 6.

Sjaastad, E. & Cousins, B. (2008). Formalisation of land rights in the South: An overview. Land Use Policy. 26: 1-9.

Turner, J. (1968). The architecture of democracy, Architectural Design, 38.

Turner, J. (1972). Freedom to build: Dweller control of the housing process. New York, NY: Macmillan.

Turner, J. (1976). Housing by people: Towards autonomy in building environments, ideas in progress. London: Marion Boyars.

UN-Habitat (2012). State of the world’s cities 2012/2013: Prosperity of cities. Nairobi: United Nations Human Settlements Programme.

Vargas Llosa, M. (1986). Prologo. El otro sendero: La revolucion informal. Lima: Editorial El Barranco.

Varley, A. (2002). Private or public: Debating the meaning of tenure legalization. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 26(3): 449-461.

Ward, P.M. (2012). Housing policies in developing countries. In S.J. Smith (Ed.), International encyclopedia of housing and home (pp. 559-572). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.

Ward, P.M., de Souza F., Giusti, C., & Larson, J.E. (2011). El titulo en la mano: The impact of titling programs on low- income housing in Texas colonias. Law and Social Inquiry. 36(1): 1-82.

Woodruff, C. (2001). Review of de Soto’s ‘The mystery of capital’. Journal of Economic Literature. 39(4): 1215-1223.

World Bank (1993). Housing: Enabling markets to work. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

World Bank (2009). Comparing regulation in 181 economies. Doing Business 2009. Washington, DC: World Bank.

World Bank (2010). Reforming through difficult times. Doing Business 2010. Washington, DC: World Bank.

World Bank (2011). Making difference for entrepreneurs. Doing Business 2011. Washington, DC: World Bank.

World Bank (2012). Doing business in a more transparent world. Doing Business 2012. Washington, DC: World Bank.

World Bank (2013a). Regolamentazioni pi efficienti per le Piccole e Medie Imprese. Doing Business in Italia 2013. Washington, DC: World Bank.

World Bank (2013b). Smart regulations for Small- and Medium- Size Enterprises. Doing Business 2013. Washington, DC: World Bank.

World Bank (2014). Understanding regulations for Small-