Operationalising resilience within urban planning

Bridging theory and practice


  • Aoife Doyle Dublin Institute of Technology





urban resilience, adaptive capacity, new institutionalism, crisis, austerity


Over the past two decades, the concept of ‘urban resilience’ has gained increasing attention within the field of urban planning. More recently, interest in the concept can be partly linked to the recent global economic crisis, which has stimulated much debate around pre-crisis urban development models, and more broadly around the ability of modern planning systems to adequately adapt and respond to changing circumstances. This paper reviews the scholarly literature on urban resilience and concludes that despite its increasing ubiquity, the concept still lacks precise definition, and operationalising the concept within the planning domain remains a challenge. Specifically, the paper highlights the importance of distinguishing between ‘equilibrium’ and ‘evolutionary’ understandings of resilience, with particular focus on the potential of the evolutionary perspective to aid analysis of local planning responses to the recent global economic crisis. In doing so, the paper also queries the potential contribution of new institutionalism, and discursive institutionalism in particular, in enhancing our understanding of the resilience concept in this context, and in addressing some of the common critiques attached to it.




Adger, N. (2000). Social and Ecological Resilience: Are They Related? Progress in Human Geography. 24(3): 347–364.

Agudelo-Vero, C.M, Leduc, W., Mels, A.R. & Rijnaarts, H.M (2012). Harvesting urban resources towards more resilient cities. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 64: 3-12.

Alexander, D.E (2013). Resilience and disaster risk reduction: an etymological journey. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences. 33(11): 2707-2716. Amenta, E. & Ramsey, K.M. (2010) Institutional theory. In K. Leicht & J. Craig Jenkins (Eds.), The handbook of politics: State and civil society in global perspective (pp. 15-39). New York, NY: Springer.

Berkes, F. & Folke, C. (1998). Linking social and ecological systems: Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brand, F. S. & Jax, F. (2007). Focusing the meaning(s) of resilience: Resilience as a descriptive concept and a boundary object. Ecology and Society. 12(1): 23-38.

Coaffee, J. (2013). Rescaling and responsibilising the politics of urban resilience: From national security to local place-making. Politics. 33(4): 240-252.

Coaffee, J. & Clarke, J. (2015). On securing the generational challenge of urban resilience. Town Planning Review. 86(3): 249-255.

Coaffee, J., Wood, D. M. & Rogers, P. (2008). The everyday resilience of the city. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Carpenter, S.R., Westley, F. & Turner, G. (2005). Surrogates for resilience of social-ecological systems. Ecosystems. 8(8): 941–944.

Crouch, C (2011). The strange non death of neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press. Davies, J.S. & Trounstine, J. (2012). Urban politics and the new institutionalism. In S. Clarke, P. John & K. Mossberger (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of urban politics (pp. 51-70). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Davidson, D.J. (2010). The applicability of the concept of resilience to social systems: Some sources of optimism and nagging doubts. Society and Natural Resources. 23(12): 1135-1149.

Davoudi, S., Shaw, K., Haider, L.J., Quinlan, A.E., Peterson, G.D., Wilkinson, C., Fünfgeld, H., McEvoy, D. & Porter, L. (2012). Resilience: A bridging concept or a dead end? ‘Reframing’ resilience: Challenges for planning. Theory and practice interacting traps: Resilience assessment of a pasture management system in northern Afghanistan. Urban resilience: What does it mean in planning practice? Resilience as a useful concept for climate change adaptation? The politics of resilience for planning: A cautionary note. Planning Theory and Practice. 13(2): 299-333.

Dudley, M (2010). Resilience. In N. Cohen (Ed.), Green Cities – An A-Z Guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Eraydin, A. (2013). Resilience thinking for planning. In A. Eraydin & T. Tasan-Kok (Eds.), Resilience thinking in urban planning (pp.17-37). Dordrecht: Springer.

Fainstein, S. (2013). Resilience and justice. MSS1 Research Papers Series. Paper No. 2. Melbourne Sustainable Society Institute. Available at: http://www.sustainable.unimelb.edu.au/files/mssi/MSSI-ResearchPaper-02_Fainstein_Resilience-Justice_2013.pdf Accessed: 20/01/15.

Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T. & Rockstrom, J. (2010). Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society. 15(4): 20-28.

Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Friedmann J. (2005). Planning cultures in transition. In B. Sanyal (Ed.), Comparative planning cultures (pp. 29-44). New York, NY: Routledge.

Friedmann, J. (2008). The uses of planning theory – A bibliographic essay. Journal of Planning Research and Education. 28(2): 247-257.

Hall, P. & Taylor, R. (1996). A political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44: 936-957.

Handmer, J., & Dovers, S.R. (1996). A typology of resilience: Rethinking institutions for sustainable development. Organization and Environment. 9(4): 486-487.

Herrfahrdt-P hle, E. & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2012). Continuity and change in social-ecological systems: The role of institutional resilience. Ecology and Society. 17(2): 8.

Holling, C.S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 4(17): 1-23.

Holling, C.S. (1996). Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience. In P.C. Schulze (Ed.), Engineering within ecological constraints (pp. 31-44). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Joseph, J. (2013). Resilience as embedded neoliberalism: A governmentality approach. Resilience: International Policies, Practices and Discourses. 1: 38-52

K rrholm, M., Nylund, K., & Prieto de la Fuente, P. (2014). Spatial resilience and urban planning: Addressing the interdependence of urban retail areas. Cities. 36: 121–130.

Knieling, J. & Othengrafen, F. (Eds.) (2015) Cities in crisis: Socio-spatial impacts of the economic crisis in Southern European cities. New York, NY: Routledge.

Lang, T. (2011). Urban resilience and new institutional theory – a happy couple for urban and regional studies? In B. Müller (Ed.), German Annual of Spatial Research and Policy, Urban Regional Resilience: How do cities and regions deal with change? (pp.15-24). Berlin. Springer.

Lang, T. (2012). How do cities and regions adapt to socio-economic crisis? Towards an institutionalist approach to urban and regional resilience. Raumforschung und Raumordnung. 70(4): 285-291.

Lovering, J. (2010). Will the Recession prove to be a turning point in planning and urban development thinking? International Planning Studies. 15(3): 227-243.

Majoor, S. (2015). Resilient practices: A paradox-oriented approach for large-scale development projects. Town Planning Review. 86(3): 257-277.

Meegan, R., Kennett, P., Jones, G. & Croft, J. (2014). Global economic crisis, austerity and neoliberal urban governance in England. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. 7(1): 137-153.

Meyer, J.W. (2000). Globalization – sources and effects on national states and societies. International Sociology. 15(2): 233-248.

Murphy, E. & Scott, M. (2013). Mortgage-related issues in a crisis economy: Evidence from rural households in Ireland. Geoforum. 36: 34-44.

Norris, M. & Byrne, M. (2015). Asset price keynesianism, regional imbalances and the Irish and Spanish housing booms and busts. UCD Geary Institute for Public Policy. Discussion Paper Series. University College Dublin. Available at: www.ucd.ie/geary/static/publications/workingpapers/gearywp201514.pdf. Accessed 02/07/16.

Oosterlynck, S. (2013). ‘Don’t waste a crisis’: Opening up the city yet again for neoliberal experimentation. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 37(3): 1075-1082.

Pelling, M. & Zaidi, Z. (2013). Measuring adaptive capacity: Application of an indexing methodology in Guyana. Environment, Politics and Development Working Paper Series. Department of Geography, King’s College London. Available at: www.kcl.ac.uk/sspp/departments/geography/research/epd/PellingZaidiWP47.pdf. Accessed 18/01/15.

Petry, J. (2013). Constructing the Eurozone crisis: A tale of PIIGS, debt and austerity. Pinpoint. Politics. Available at: www.academia.edu/5361157/Constructing_the_Eurozone_crisis_A_tale_of_PIIGS_debt_and_austerity. Accessed 08/09/16.

Pimm, S.L. (1991). The balance of nature? Ecological issues in the conservation of species and communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Pizzo, B. (2014). Problematizing resilience: Implications for planning theory and practice. Cities. 43: 133-140.

Schmidt, V.A. (2010). Taking ideas and discourse seriously: Explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘new institutionalism’. European Political Science Review. 2(1): 1-25.

Schmidt, V.A. (2012). Speaking to the market or the people? A discursive institutionalist analysis of EU leaders’ discourse during the EU’s sovereign debt crisis. Paper presented at the Council for European Studies Conference, Boston, 22-24 March. Available at: http://blogs.bu.edu/vschmidt/files/2012/06/Schmidt-CES-paper-Speaking-to-the-markets-or-the-people.pdf. Accessed 08/07/16.

Shepsle, K. (2006). Rational choice institutionalism. In S. Binder, R.A. Rhodes & B. Rockman, (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political institutions (pp.23-39). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Simpson, R. & Stoffregen, A. (2011). The urban dream vs the urban myth. Crisis Response Journal. 6(4): 8-9.

Sommer, M. (2014). European crisis discourses – the case of Germany. In Crisis Discourses in Europe: Media EU-Phemisms and Alternative Narratives. Background paper. Civil Society and Human Security Research Unit. London School of Economics and Political Science. Available at: www.lse.ac.uk/internationalDevelopment/research/CSHS/pdfs/Crisis-Discourses-in-Europe.pdf. Accessed 18/01/15.

Swanstrom, T. (2008). Regional resilience: A critical examination of the ecological framework. Paper presented at the Urban Affairs Association Annual Meeting, Baltimore, 25 April. http://brr.berkeley.edu/brr_workingpapers/2008-07-swanstrom-ecological_framework.pdf. Accessed: 08/11/2016.

Tulumello, S. (2016). Reconsidering neoliberal urban planning in times of crisis: Urban regeneration policy in a ‘dense’ space in Lisbon. Urban Geography. 37(1): 117-140.

Verma, N. (Ed.) (2007). Institutions and planning. Boston, MA: Elsevier.

UNISDR (2009). UNISDR terminology on disaster risk reduction. Available at: www.unisdr.org/we/inform/publications/7817. Accessed: 08/02/15.

Weir, M. (2003). Institutional politics and multi-dimensional actors: Organized labor and America’s urban problem. Paper presented at Crafting and Operating Institutions Conference, Yale University, 11-13 April. Available at: www.yale.edu/coic/weir.doc. Accessed: 01/02/15. White, I. & O’Hare, P. (2014). From rhetoric to reality: Which resilience, why resilience, and whose resilience in spatial planning? Environment and Planning C. 32(5): 934-950.

Wilkinson, C. (2011). Social-ecological resilience: Insights and issues for planning theory. Planning Theory. 11(2): 148-169.