Downloads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/117Keywords:
energy seascapes, contested places, infrastructure planning, more-than-humanAbstract
This study explores the role played by the seascape in the public acceptance of nearshore and offshore wind farms. The transposition of onshore wind farms to the sea has been defended as an alternative to mitigate resistance, assuming that, by locating them offshore, opposition would be halted. However, research indicates that this is a misconception, as offshore sites do not guarantee a problem-free solution for wind farms, and conflicts can persist even when wind parks are planned to be installed away from populated areas. The study discusses how the seascape can be perceived differently by various stakeholders and emphasises the importance of considering it as a key factor in the success of the planned exploration. The proposal of offshore wind parks along the coast of Portugal is used as a case study to analyse how it was received by different sectors of society. Findings reveal that stakeholders with strong ties to the seascape were not included in the decision-making process from the very start, which led to fierce opposition in areas where sea uses are deemed to be in conflict. It is therefore argued that the non-human agency of the seascape should not be ignored, since it can form relations. It is suggested that a comprehensive understanding of the seascape could help build better-informed decisions, as its environmental characteristics and functioning, and the social construct that is formed between different groups and the seascape, are capable of shaping the stakeholder group and influencing the social acceptance of an energy project.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Luis Carlos de Medeiros Raposo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Agência Lusa. (2025). Eólicas offshore absorvem “maior local de pesca” de Viana do Castelo. https://observador.pt/2025/02/11/eolicas-offshore-absorvem-maior-local-de-pesca-de-viana-do-castelo
Allen, C. (2011). On actor-network theory and landscape. Area, 43(3), 274–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01026.x
Balık, G., & Balık Lökçe, D. (2019). On the relationship of landscape and painting. AM Journal, 19, 29–44. https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i19.305
Binns, A., Rajabifard, A., Collier, P. A., & Williamson, I. P. (2004). Developing the concept of a marine cadastre: An Australian case study. The Australian Surveyor, 6.
Bray, L., Reizopoulou, S., Voukouvalas, E., Soukissian, T., Alomar, C., Vázquez-Luis, M., Deudero, S., Attrill, M. J., & Hall-Spencer, J. M. (2016). Expected effects of offshore wind farms on Mediterranean marine life. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 4(18), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse4010018
Contesse, M., Duncan, J., Legun, K., & Klerkx, L. (2021). Unravelling non-human agency in sustainability transitions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 120634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120634
Costa, P., Simões, T., & Estanqueiro, A. (2010). Sustainable offshore wind potential in continental Portugal. In Proceedings of the Workshop “Oceans as a Source of Energy” (pp. 40–43). Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften.
De Medeiros Raposo, L. C. (2023). Parecer – Proposta preliminar de novas áreas de implantação para energias renováveis. Guimarães.
Devine-Wright, P. (2005). Beyond NIMBYism: Towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy. Wind Energy, 8, 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.124
Direção-Geral de Recursos Naturais, Segurança e Serviços Marítimos - DGRM. (2023a). Avaliação ambiental estratégica do plano de afetação para as energias renováveis offshore. Lisboa.
Direção-Geral de Recursos Naturais, Segurança e Serviços Marítimos - DGRM. (2023b) Proposta de Plano de Afetação para as Energias Renováveis Offshore Versão para Consulta Pública Outubro 2023. Lisboa.
European Commission. (2020). An EU strategy to harness the potential of offshore renewable energy for a climate-neutral future (COM(2020) 741 final). Brussels.
European Commission. (2023). European wind power action plan (COM(2023) 669 final). Brussels.
European Parliament. (2008). Directive 2008/56/EC establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive). Brussels.
European Parliament. (2014). Directive 2014/89/EU establishing a framework for maritime spatial planning. Brussels.
European Parliament. (2018). Directive 2018/2001 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. Brussels.
European Parliament. (2021). Resolution P9_TA(2021)0338 on the impact on the fishing sector of offshore windfarms and other renewable energy systems. Brussels.
Fang, J., Cheng, Y., & Liu, B. (2024). From two-dimensional to three-dimensional marine spatial planning methodology: A case study of Qidong. Ocean & Coastal Management, 253, 107163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107163
Firestone, J., & Kempton, W. (2007). Public opinion about large offshore wind power: Underlying factors. Energy Policy, 35, 1584–1598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.04.010
Garthe, S., & Hüppop, O. (2004). Scaling possible adverse effects of marine wind farms on seabirds: Developing and applying a vulnerability index. Journal of Applied Ecology, 41, 724–734. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00918.x
GEOTA. (2023). Parecer GEOTA – Proposta para energias renováveis offshore. https://www.geota.pt/blogs/parecer-sobre-proposta-preliminar-de-novas-areas-de-implantacao-para-energias-renovaveis-offshore
Greider, T., & Garkovich, L. (1994). Landscapes: The social construction of nature and the environment. Rural Sociology, 59(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.1994.tb00519.x
GTOffshore. (2022). Relatório – Proposta preliminar das áreas espacializadas e dos pontos para a ligação à Rede Nacional de Transporte de Eletricidade. Lisboa.
GTOffshore. (2023). Relatório – Versão final. Lisboa.
Haggett, C. (2008). Over the sea and far away? A consideration of the planning, politics and public perception of offshore wind farms. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 10(3), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080802242787
Haggett, C. (2011). Understanding public responses to offshore wind power. Energy Policy, 39(2), 503–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.10.014
Henderson, A. (2002). Offshore wind in Europe – The current state of the art. Refocus, March/April, 14–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1471-0846(02)80021-X
Hernandez-Santin, C., Amati, M., Bekessy, S., & Desha, C. (2023). Integrating biodiversity as a non-human stakeholder within urban development. Landscape and Urban Planning, 232, 104678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104678
Hillman, M., Brierley, G., & Fryirs, K. (2008). Social and biophysical connectivity of river systems. In G. Brierley & K. Fryirs (Eds.), River futures: An integrative scientific approach to river repair (pp. 125–142). Island Press.
IPBES. (2021). Seascape. IPBES core glossary. https://www.ipbes.net/glossary-tag/seascape
Jay, S. (2012). Marine space: Manoeuvring towards a relational understanding. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 14(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2012.662383
Ladenburg, J. (2008). Attitudes towards on-land and offshore wind power development in Denmark; choice of development strategy. Renewable Energy, 33, 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2007.01.011
Ladenburg, J. (2010). Attitudes towards offshore wind farms—The role of beach visits on attitude and demographic and attitude relations. Energy Policy, 38, 1297–1304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.005
Leitão, F., Baptista, V., Zeller, D., & Erzini, K. (2014). Reconstructed catches and trends for mainland Portugal fisheries between 1938 and 2009: Implications for sustainability, domestic fish supply and imports. Fisheries Research, 155, 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2014.02.012
Negócios com Lusa. (2023). Matosinhos já não vai ter 1 GW de turbinas eólicas perto da costa. https://www.jornaldenegocios.pt/empresas/energia/detalhe/matosinhos-ja-nao-vai-ter-1-gw-de-turbinas-eolicas-perto-da-costa
Nuttall, C. (2021). Seascape dialogues: Human-sea interaction in the Aegean from Late Neolithic to Late Bronze Age [Doctoral dissertation]. Uppsala University.
O Minho/Lusa. (2023). Pescadores ameaçam avançar para tribunal europeu: “Não haverá eólicas em frente a Viana”. https://ominho.pt/pescadores-ameaca-avancar-para-tribunal-europeu-nao-havera-eolicas-em-frente-a-viana
Pacheco, M. F. (2013). Pesqueiras do Rio Minho: Valorização do património cultural gestão de recursos naturais [Master’s thesis]. Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo.
Pasqualetti, M., & Stremke, S. (2018). Energy landscapes in a crowded world: A first typology of origins and expressions. Energy Research & Social Science, 36, 94–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.030
Porto Canal. (2023). Porto alertou para o barulho das turbinas e impacto das eólicas na Foz Velha. https://portocanal.sapo.pt/noticia/330899
Rajabifard, A., Binns, A., & Williamson, I. (2005). Administering the marine environment – The spatial dimension. Journal of Spatial Science, 50(2), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/14498596.2005.9635050
República Portuguesa. (2021). Resolução do Conselho de Ministros n.º 68/2021. Diário da República, 1ª série, nº 20, 23–62.
República Portuguesa. (2023). Despacho n.º 1396-C/2023. Diário da República, 2ª série, Parte C, nº 20, 498(4).
República Portuguesa. (2025). Resolução do Conselho de Ministros n.º 19/2025 – Aprova o Plano de Afetação para as Energias Renováveis Offshore. Diário da República, 1ª série, nº 27, 157.
SPEA. (2023). Parecer – Proposta preliminar para novas áreas de implantação para energias renováveis offshore. Lisboa. https://spea.pt/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Parecer-SPEA-proposta-preliminar-para-novas-a%CC%81reas-de-implantacao-para-energias-renova%CC%81veis_Marc%CC%A7o_2023_HQ.pdf
Temper, L., Avila, S., Del Bene, D., Gobby, J., Kosoy, N., Le Billon, P., Martinez-Alier, J., Perkins, P., Roy, B., Scheidel, A., & Walter, M. (2020). Movements shaping climate futures: A systematic mapping of protests against fossil fuel and low-carbon energy projects. Environmental Research Letters, 15, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc197
Walker, G. (1995). Renewable energy and the public. Land Use Policy, 12(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-8377(95)90074-C
Warren, C. R., Lumsden, C., O'Dowd, S., & Birnie, R. V. (2005). Green on green: Public perceptions of wind power in Scotland and Ireland. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 48(6), 853–858. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560500294376
Windplus & Ecobase Consulting. (2015). Central eólica offshore – WindFloat Atlantic: Estudo de incidências ambientais.
Wolsink, M. (2010). Near-shore wind power: Protected seascapes, environmentalist’s attitude, and the technocratic planning perspective. Land Use Policy, 27, 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.04.004
Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M., & Burer, M. J. (2007). Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept. Energy Policy, 35, 2683–2691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001
