Downloads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/102Keywords:
deterritorialization, financialization, urban development, major projects, MilanoAbstract
Major urban development projects are pivotal to connect financial and real estate markets through the ‘financialization’ of strategic lands and the ‘deterritorialization’ of actors, practices and instruments. Milan is currently facing several large-scale property operations delivered by global developers and investors. Among these, this article problematizes the Milano Innovation District (MIND) by reconstructing its spatial development, showing how property financialization generates a deterritorialization of this project from the city planning system. Milan’s case has been considered relevant because of the convergence of global and local interest in developing the former Expo 2015 site, in a little metropolis which, on the other hand, shows an enormous concentration of financial capital managed in the Milanese headquarters of some of the largest European banks. In this article I will introduce the concept of financialization, which challenges land uses in this hyper-capitalization time, provide an illustration of the Milanese planning system, outline the interactions between planning, politics and finance, and present the case analysis of MIND and a discussion of its findings. In conclusion, this contribution remarks how such projects are used as levers to pursue polycentrism by challenging the ‘raison d’étre’ of statutory planning in overseeing the city’s urban growth instead of just enabling land value extraction, expansion and densification. Overall, the article argues that financialization has undermined redistribution of wealth through spatial planning, and this role has shifted to the major property corporations.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Alberto Bortolotti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Aalbers, M. B. (2020). Financial geography III: The financialization of the city. Progress in Human Geography, 44(3), 595–607. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519853922
Aalbers, M. B. (2019). Financialization. In D. Richardson, N. Castree, M. F. Goodchild, A. L. Kobayashi, & R. Marston (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of geography: People, the earth, environment, and technology. Oxford: Wiley.
Agnew, A. (1994). The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy, 1(1), 53–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692299408434268
Alami, I., & Dixon, A. D. (2021). Uneven and combined state capitalism. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 55(1), 72–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X211037688
Albrechts, L., Healey, P., & Kunzmann, K. R. (2003). Strategic spatial planning and regional governance in Europe. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(2), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360308976301
Altshuler, A., & Luberoff, D. (2003). Mega-projects. The changing politics of urban public investment. Chicago, USA: Donnelley.
Anselmi, G., & Vicari, S. (2020). Milan makes it to the big leagues: A financialized growth machine at work. European Urban and Regional Studies, 27(2), 106–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776419860871
Arexpo. (2022). Bilancio annuale. Milano: Arexpo publications.
Arexpo. (2016). Bilancio annuale. Milano: Quaderni Arexpo.
Armondi, S., & Di Vita, S. (2018). Milan: Productions, spatial patterns and urban change. London: Routledge.
Banca d’Italia (2023). Rapporto Annuale. L’economia della Lombardia. Roma: Banca d’Italia Eurosistema.
Borghi, A. (2009). Finanza immobiliare: il mercato, la valutazione, gli strumenti e le tecniche di finanziamento. Milano: Egea.
Botto, I., & Di Vita, S. (2018). Oltre l'Expo 2015: Tra dimensione ordinaria e straordinaria delle politiche urbane. Roma: Carocci.
Briata, P., & Raco, M. (2022). The financialisation of urban policy in the UK: From area-based initiatives to area-based value-capture. In F. Gelli & M. Basso (Eds.), Identifying models of national urban agendas: A view to the global transition (pp. 57–76). Cham: Springer.
Camagni, R. (2016). Urban development and control on urban land rents. Annals of Regional Science, 56, 597–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-015-0733-6
Chiapello, E. (2015). Financialisation of valuation. Human Studies, 38, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-014-9337-x
Cocco, G. (2007). The labor of territories between deterritorialization and reterritorialization. Rethinking Marxism, 19(3), 306–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/08935690701412703
Colenutt, B., Cochrane, A., & Field, M. (2015). The rise and rise of viability assessment. Town and Country Planning, 84, 453–458.
Comune di Milano, Arexpo, & Lendlease. (2020). Programma Integrato di Intervento MIND. Milano: Comune di Milano.
Capello, R., Caragliu, A., & Fratesi, U. (2018). Measuring border effects in European cross-border regions. Regional Studies, 52(7), 986–996. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1364843
Conte, V., & Anselmi, G. (2022). When large-scale regeneration becomes an engine of urban growth: How new power coalitions are shaping Milan’s governance. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 54(6), 1184–1199. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0308518X221100828
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1972). Anti-Oedipus capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Dente, B., Bobbio, L., Fareri, P., & Morisi, M. (1990). Metropoli per progetti: Attori e processi di trasformazione urbana a Firenze, Torino, Milano. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Di Vita, S., & Morandi, C. (2018). Mega-events and legacies in post-metropolitan spaces: Expos and urban agendas. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Edwards, M. (2020). How much land value should be captured for collective purposes? In The wrong answers to the wrong questions: Countering the misconceptions driving the Government’s planning reform agenda. London: Town and Country Planning Association.
Epstein, G. A. (2005). Financialization and the world economy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Essex, S., & Chakley, B. (2010). Urban transformation from hosting the Olympic Games. London: Olympic Studies Centre.
Fainstein, S. S. (2008). Mega-projects in New York, London and Amsterdam. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(4), 767–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00826.x
Fainstein, S. S. (2016). Financialisation and justice in the city: A commentary. Urban Studies, 53(7), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098016630488
Faludi, A. (2018). The poverty of territorialism: A neo-medieval view of Europe and European planning. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2014). What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview. Project Management Journal, 45(2), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21409
Foucault, M. (1982). Space, knowledge, and power. Paris: Skyline.
Foucault, M. (1984). Des espaces autres. Tunisi: Cercle d’études architectuales.
Gaeta, L., & Di Vita, S. (2021). Planning disaster, successful event, and uncertain future: The twin cases of the World Expo 2015 and Innovation District in Milan. Les Cahiers de la recherche architecturale urbaine et paysagère, 12. https://doi.org/10.4000/craup.8735
Gervasoni, A., Lertora, M., & Mietto, M. (2024). Smart cities and sustainable development: The MIND district case. A new model for urban regeneration. ExSUF Center publication. https://exsuf.liuc.it/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Smart-cities-and-Sustainable-Development_the-MIND-district-case_april-2024.pdf
Gotham, K.F. (2012). Creating liquidity out of spatial fixity: The secondary circuit of capital and the restructuring of the US housing finance system. In M. B. Aalbers (Ed.), Subprime cities: The political economy of mortgage markets (pp. 25–52). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Haila, A. (2008). From Annankatu to Antinkatu: Contracts, development rights, and partnerships in Kamppi, Helsinki. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(4), 804–814. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00824.x
Harvey, D. (2005). Spaces of global capitalism: A theory of uneven geographical development. London: Verso Books.
Hiller, H. (2006). Post-event outcomes and the post-modern turn: The Olympics and urban transformations. European Sport Management Quarterly, 6(4), 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184740601154458
Jessop, B. (1990). State theory: Putting the state in its place. Cambridge: Polity.
Jessop, B. (2016). The state: Past, present, future. New York: Wiley.
Kaika, M., & Ruggiero, L. (2016). Land financialization as a lived process: The transformation of Milan’s Bicocca by Pirelli. European Urban and Regional Studies, 23(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776413484166
Lake, R. W. (2015). The financialization of urban policy in the age of Obama. Journal of Urban Affairs, 37(1), 75–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12167
Leyshon, A., & Thrift, N. (2007). The capitalization of almost everything: The future of finance and capitalism. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(7–8), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407084699
Mazza, L. (2007). Milan’s strategies. In ISOCARP Review. Urban trialogues: Co-productive ways to relate visioning and strategic urban projects (pp. 12–27). The Hague: ISOCARP.
Medeiros, E., Ramirez, M. G., Ocskay, G., & Peyrony, J. (2021). Covidfencing effects on cross-border deterritorialism: The case of Europe. European Planning Studies, 29(5), 962–982. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1818185
Modiano, P., & Onado, M. (2023). Illusioni Perdute. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Mosciaro, M. (2021). Selling Milan in pieces: The finance-led production of urban space. European Planning Studies, 29(1), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1735309
Müller, M. (2011). State dirigisme in megaprojects: Governing the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi. Environment and Planning A, 43(9), 2091–2108. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43284
Müller, M. (2015). The mega-event syndrome: Why so much goes wrong in mega-event planning and what to do about it. Journal of the American Planning Association, 81(1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2015.1038292
Nobanee, H., Shanti, H., Shikder, A., Almarzooqi, M., Vaz, A., & Masood, S. (2023). Financialization: A bibliometric review, research streams, influential works, and future research paths. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2269684
Pasqui, G. (2018). Raccontare Milano: Politiche, progetti, immaginari. Milano: Franco Angeli.
Raco, M. (2014). Delivering flagship projects in an era of regulatory capitalism: State-led privatization and the London Olympics 2012. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(1), 176–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12025
Raco, M., Livingstone, N., & Durrant, D. (2019). Seeing like an investor: Urban development planning, financialisation, and investors’ perceptions of London as an investment space. European Planning Studies, 27(6), 1064–1082. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1598019
Raco, M., & Brill, F. (2022). London. London: Agenda Publishing.
Raco, M., & Tasan-Kok, T. (2023). Le (in)visibili ambiguità delle riforme urbanistiche guidate dagli operatori immobiliari: essere dentro o contro il mercato. In Balducci, A. (Ed), La città invisibile. Quello che non vediamo sta cambiando le metropoli. Milano: Feltrinelli.
Rogers, R. (1999). Towards an urban renaissance. London: Department of the Environment, Transport, and the Regions.
Salet, W. (2008). Rethinking urban projects: Experiences in Europe. Urban Studies, 45(11), 2343–2363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098008095871
Salet, W., & Gualini, E. (2007). Framing strategic urban projects: Learning from current experiences in European urban regions. London: Routledge.
Salet, W., & Majoor, S. (2005). Amsterdam Zuidas. European space. Rotterdam: 010 Publishing.
Savini, F., & Aalbers, M. B. (2016). The de-contextualisation of land use planning through financialisation: Urban redevelopment in Milan. European Urban and Regional Studies, 23(4), 878–894. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776415585887
Silver, J., Fields, D., Goulding, R., Rise, I., & Donnachie, S. (2020). Walking the financialized city: Confronting capitalist urbanization through mobile popular education. Community Development Journal, 56(1), 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsaa044
Swyngedouw, E., Moulaert, F., & Rodriguez, A. (2002). Neoliberal urbanization in Europe: Large-scale urban development projects and the new urban policy. Antipode, 34(3), 542–577. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00254
Swyngedouw, E., & Ward, C. (2022). Land as an asset. In M. Hyötyläinen, & R. Beauregard (Eds.), The political economy of land: Rent, financialization and resistance. London: Routledge Handbook.
Tasan-Kok, T., & Ozogul, S. (2021). Fragmented governance architectures underlying residential property production in Amsterdam. Economy and Space, 53(6), 1314–1330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X21996351
van Loon, J., & Aalbers, M. B. (2017). How real estate became “just another asset class”: The financialization of the investment strategies of Dutch institutional investors. European Planning Studies, 25(2), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1277693
van Loon, J., Oosterlynck, S., & Aalbers, M. B. (2019). Governing urban development in the Low Countries: From managerialism to entrepreneurialism and financialization. European Urban and Regional Studies, 26(4), 400–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776418798673
Yeşilbağ, M. (2019). The state-orchestrated financialisation of housing in Turkey. Housing Policy Debate, 30(4), 533–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2019.1670715
Wijburg, G. (2019). Reasserting state power by remaking markets? The introduction of real estate investment trusts in France and its implications for state-finance relations in the Greater Paris region. Geoforum, 100, 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.01.012
Wood, S. (2009). Desiring Docklands. Deleuze and urban planning discourse. Planning Theory, 8(2), 191–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095209102234
World Bank. (2020). Private participation in infrastructure—2020 annual report. Washington: World Bank publications.
