Downloads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/100Keywords:
neoliberal urbanism, urban social movements, co-optation, post-political city, agonistic urbanism, democracyAbstract
In the context of the ongoing global intertwined financial, environmental, socio-political crises, the intricate relationship between neoliberal urban planning and the challenges these crises present has become increasingly visible. Despite these challenges, neoliberal restructuring justifications remain central to urban agendas and planning culture, often exacerbating social inequality. Its principles and related political decisions frequently intensify social conflicts, sparking protests as their adverse effects on marginalized communities and areas become evident, especially after decades of market-driven policies and the global financial crisis. In many cities around the globe, these popular rebellions, as local and residential activism, started increasingly to target varying regulatory regimes and strategies pursued by supranational, national, or local authorities, often organized as urban social movements.
This think piece examines how neoliberal urbanism simultaneously incites resistance and absorbs it, reflecting a paradox where insurgent practices challenge the system but are also co-opted into its framework. By exploring key dynamics in urban governance, participation, and social movements, it seeks to understand how neoliberalism’s resilience lies in its ability to incorporate dissent into its operating logic while marginalizing radical alternatives, so to perpetuate its dominance despite widespread opposition. Briefly mentioning some examples of organized groups and forms of resistance around the globe, theoretical debates, and historical perspectives, the discussion unfolds by: analyzing how neoliberal practices shape urban governance and planning; investigating how movements resist neoliberalism and how their ideas are co-opted; addressing the enduring struggle over “to whom the city belongs” and proposing ways to foster meaningful democratic engagement.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Luisa Rossini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Aalbers, M. B. (2020). Financial geography III: The financialization of the city. Progress in Human Geography, 44(3), 595–607. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519853922
Ahlfeldt, G. M. (2011). Blessing or curse? Appreciation, amenities and resistance around the Berlin 'Mediaspree'. Hamburg Contemporary Economic Discussions, 32, 1–30.
Anguelovski, I. (2013). New directions in urban environmental justice: Rebuilding community, addressing trauma, and remaking place. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 33(2), 160–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X13478019
Berglund, O., & Schmidt, D. (2020). Extinction Rebellion and climate change activism: Breaking the law to change the world. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (2002). Cities and the geographies of “actually existing neoliberalism.” Antipode, 34(3), 349–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00246
Bryman, A. (2004). The Disneyization of society. London: Sage.
Cardullo, P., Di Feliciantonio, C., & Kitchin, R. (2019). The right to the smart city. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.
Castells, M. (1983). The city and the grassroots: A cross-cultural theory of urban social movements. London: Edward Arnold.
Chaplin, S., & Holding, E. (Eds.) (1998). Consuming architecture. Chichester: Architectural Design.
Colau, A., & Alemany, A. (2014). Mortgaged lives: From the housing bubble to the right to housing. Los Angeles, CA: Journal of Aesthetics and Protest Press.
Colomb, C. (2012). Pushing the urban frontier: Temporary uses of space, city marketing, and the creative city discourse in 2000s Berlin. Journal of Urban Affairs, 30(2), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2012.00607.x
Davies, M. (1998). City of quartz: Excavating the future of Los Angeles. London: Pimlico.
De Nardis, F., & Antonazzo, L. (2017). Some theoretical insights on social movements and resistance practices in the era of de-politicization of representative politics. SocietàMutamentoPolitica, 8(15), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.13128/SMP-20852
Esposito, R. (2021). Instituting thought: Three paradigms of political ontology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Fields, D.J., & Hodkinson, S.N. (2018). Housing policy in crisis: An international perspective. Housing Policy Debate, 28(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2018.1395988
Ginwala, N., Kirn, G., & Tajeri, N. (Eds.). (2021). Nights of the dispossessed: Riots unbound. New York, NY: Columbia Books on Architecture and the City.
Giardini, F., Mattei, U., & Spregelburd, R. (2012). Teatro Valle Occupato: La rivolta culturale dei beni comuni. Rome: DeriveApprodi.
Hammami, F., Jewesbury, D., & Valli, C. (Eds.). (2022). Heritage, gentrification, and resistance in the neoliberal city. New York & Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Harvey, D. (1989). From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 71(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.1989.11879583
Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. London: Verso.
Hilbrandt, H. (2017). Insurgent participation: Consensus and contestation in planning the redevelopment of Berlin-Tempelhof airport. Urban Geography, 38(4), 537–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1168569
Holm, A. (2021). From protest to program Berlin’s anti-gentrification-movement since reunification. In Fregolent, L., & Nel·lo, O. (Eds.) Social movements and public policies in Southern European cities (pp. 33–52). Urban and Landscape Perspectives, vol. 21. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52754-9_3
Holm, A., & Kuhn, A. (2011). Squatting and urban renewal: The interaction of squatter movements and strategies of urban restructuring in Berlin. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(3), 644–658. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.001009.x
Holston, J. (2007). Insurgent citizenship: Disjunctions of democracy and modernity in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Imrie, R., & Raco, M. (2000). Governmentality and rights and responsibilities in urban policy. Environment and Planning A, 32(12), 2187–2204. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3365
Lees, L., Shin, H. B., & López-Morales, E. (2016). Planetary gentrification. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Lefebvre, H. (1974). La Production de l'espace. Paris: Anthropos.
Li Destri Nicosia, G., & Saija, L. (2023). Planning as an instituting process: Overcoming Agamben’s despair using Esposito’s political ontology. Planning Theory, 24(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/14730952231209755
Local Government Association. (2010). A download from the Big Society: A look at the Big Society through local eyes. Retrieved March 26, 2025, from https://www.local.gov.uk/sites/default/files/documents/download-big-society-look-97a.pdf
LSE Politics and Policy. (2011). Big society risks undermining state and civil society. Retrieved March 26, 2025, from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/big-society-risks-undermining-state-and-civil-society/
Madden, D., & Marcuse, P. (2016). In defense of housing: The politics of crisis. London: Verso.
Marcuse, P. (2010). The right to the city: From critical analysis to the contested practice of urban reform. In S. Fainstein & S. Campbell (Eds.), Readings in urban theory (pp. 190–213). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Martínez López, M. A. (2018). The urban politics of squatters' movements. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Martinez, M. A. (2019). Bitter wins or a long-distance race? Social and political outcomes of the Spanish housing movement. Housing Studies, 34(10), 1588–1611. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2018.1447094
Mayer, M. (2000). Urban social movements in an era of globalization. In P. Hamel, H. Lustiger-Thaler, & M. Mayer (Eds.), Urban movements in a globalizing world (pp. 141–156). London: Routledge.
Mayer, M. (2016). Urban social movements in times of austerity politics. In B. Schönig & S. Schipper (Eds.), Urban austerity: Impacts of the global financial crisis on cities in Europe (pp. 219–241). Berlin: Theatre der Zeit.
Mouffe, C., & Laclau, E. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratics politics. London & New York: Verso.
Mouffe, C. (2000). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism. Political Science Series for the Institut für Höhere Studien (IHS), Wien.
Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the world politically. London: Verso.
Mouffe, C., & Laclau, E. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London & New York: Verso.
Moulaert, F., Rodríguez, A., & Swyngedouw, E. (Eds.). (2003). The globalized city: Economic restructuring and social polarization in European cities. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Nicholls, W., Miller, B., & Beaumont, J. (Eds.). (2013). Spaces of contention: Spatialities and social movements. London: Routledge.
Pask, A. (2010). Public space activism, Toronto and Vancouver: Using the banner of public space to build capacity and activate change. In J. Hou (Ed.), Insurgent public space: Guerrilla urbanism and the remaking of contemporary cities (pp. 227–240). London & New York: Routledge.
Peck, J., Theodore, N., & Brenner, N. (2009). Neoliberal urbanism: Models, moments, mutations. SAIS Review of International Affairs, 29(1), 49–66. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27000166
Porter, L., & Shaw, K. (2009). Whose urban renaissance? An international comparison of urban regeneration strategies. London & New York: Routledge.
Purcell, M. (2002). Excavating Lefebvre: The right to the city and its urban politics of inhabitant. Geojournal, 58, 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GEJO.0000010829.62237.8f
Purcell, M., (2008). Recapturing democracy: Neoliberalization and the struggle for alternative urban futures. New York, NY: Routledge.
Purcell, M. (2009). Resisting neoliberalization: Communicative planning or counter-hegemonic movements. Planning Theory, 8(2), 140–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095209102232
Rossi, U., & Vanolo, A. (2012). Urban political geographies. London: Sage. [Original ed. Geografia politica urbana, Laterza, 2010].
Rossini, L. (2024). Reclaiming public spaces: Radical alternatives to the exclusionary project of rightsizing policies. plaNext – Next Generation Planning, 14, 60–84. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/99
Rossini, L., & Bianchi, I. (2019). Negotiating (re)appropriation practices amid crisis and austerity. International Planning Studies, 25(1), 100–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2019.1701424
Shaw, P., & Hudson, J. (2009). The qualities of informal space: (Re)appropriation within the informal, interstitial spaces of the city. Proceedings of the conference “Occupation: Negotiations with Constructed Space”, University of Brighton.
Sisson, A., Rogers, D., & Gibson, C. (2019). Property speculation, global capital, urban planning, and financialisation: Sydney Boom, Sydney Bust redux. Australian Geographer, 50(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049182.2018.1464365
Sorkin, M. (Ed.). (1992). Variations on a theme park: The new American city and the end of public space. New York, NY: Hill & Wang.
Swyngedouw, E. (2009). The antinomies of the postpolitical city: In search of a democratic politics of environmental production. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(3), 601–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00859.x
Tajeri, N. (2019). The Gecekondu Protest Hut of Kotti & Co – A space for housing rights in Berlin. Kotti & Co. Retrieved March 26, 2025, from https://kottiundco.net/2019/06/02/english-the-gecekondu-protest-hut-of-kotti-co-a-space-for-housing-rights-in-berlin/
Tugal, C. (2013). “Resistance everywhere”: The Gezi revolt in global perspective. New Perspectives on Turkey, 49, 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0896634600002077
