For a dialectic of planning pasts and futures: Theoretical courses and recourses in conversation with Patsy Healey

Authors

Downloads

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/103

Abstract

Planning theory has done much, during the last decade or so, to broaden and enrich its own geographies: thanks to the engagements with critical urban studies and post-colonial theory, planning theorists have problematised the disciplinary insistence on certain modernist ideas and universalist approaches. Much less has been done to problematise the relation of planning with time—its ontology of action. This short essay takes step from my personal experience of editing a special issue of plaNext with Patsy Healey to argue for a different—dialectic, open, experimental—engagement of planning theory/practice with time, an endeavour that seems perfectly fit for a journal like plaNext turning 10 years old.

Published

2025-07-04

Issue

Vol. 15 (2025): The 10th Anniversary: plaNext and Planning in Transition

Section

Essay

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Simone Tulumello

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author Biography

Simone Tulumello, Institute of Social Sciences, University of Lisbon, Portugal

Simone Tulumello is associate research professor in human geography at the University of Lisbon, Institute of Social Sciences, where he is also president of the Ethics Commission and member of the scientific committee of the PhD in Development Studies. At the crossroads of human geography, critical urban studies and political economy, Simone is interested in the multi-scalar dimensions of urbanization, with focus on urban security and violence, housing policy and politics, urban imaginaries, and urbanization in the semi-periphery. Among his books are Urban Violence: Security, Imaginary, Atmosphere (with Andrea Pavoni; 2023, Lexington), Habitação além da “crise”: políticas, conflito, direito (2024; Tigre de Papel) and Fear, Space and Urban Planning: A Critical Perspective from Southern Europe (2017; Springer).

References

Angelo, H., & Vormann, B. (2018). Long waves of urban reform: Putting the smart city in its place. City, 22(5–6), 782–800. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2018.1549850

Arrighi, G. (2010). The long twentieth century: Money, power and the origins of our times (Original work published 1994). London: Verso.

Bates, L. K. (Ed.). (2018). Race and spatial imaginary: Planning otherwise. Planning Theory & Practice, 19(2), 254–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2018.1456816

Buitrago-Sevilla, A. (2022). Against the commons: A radical history of urban planning. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Caruso, N., Hammami, F., Peker, E., Tulumello, S., & Ugur, L. (2016). Differences and connections: Beyond universal theories in planning, urban, and heritage studies. Urban Research and Practice, 9(2), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2016.1174418

Castillo Ulloa, I. (2016). From apophenia to epiphany: Making planning theory-research-practice co-constitutive. plaNext – Next Generation Planning, 3, 16–35. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt.2016.03.002

Cole, S. (2001). Dare to dream: Bridging futures into planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67(4), 373–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360108976246

Doyle, A. (2016). Operationalising resilience within urban planning – Bridging theory and practice. plaNext – Next Generation Planning, 3, 101–113. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt.2016.03.007

Fontana, C. (2016). Hernando de Soto on land titling: Consensus and criticism. plaNext – next generation planning, 3, 36–48. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt.2016.03.003

Gilmore, R. W. (2023). Abolition geography: Essays toward liberation. London: Verso.

Harney, S., & Moten, F. (2013). The undercommons: Fugitive planning and Black study. Wivenhoe: Minor Compositions.

Healey, P. (2012). The universal and the contingent: Some reflections on the transnational flow of planning ideas and practices. Planning Theory, 11(2), 188–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095211419333

Kaika, M., & Ruggiero, L. (2024). Class meets land: The embodied history of land financialization. Oakland: University of California Press.

Levin-Keitel, M. (2016). Systemic constellations in spatial planning processes: A method to visualise questions of power and cultural peculiarities? plaNext – Next Generation Planning, 3, 67–81. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt.2016.03.005

Nadin, V. (2012). International comparative planning methodology: Introduction to the theme issue. Planning Practice & Research, 27(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.669928

Pavoni, A., Pereira, L., & Tulumello, S. (2025). Planning (in) the next century? On the futures of planning that are already here. Journal of Planning Literature, 40(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/08854122241265115

Roy, A. (2009). Strangely familiar: Planning and the worlds of insurgence and informality. Planning Theory, 8(1), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095208099294

Sanchez, T. W., & Nguyen, M. T. (2025). Special issue: “Alternative planning futures: Planning the next century”. Journal of Planning Literature, 40(2), 151–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/08854122251314478

Tulumello, S., & Healey, P. (2016). Questioning planning, connecting places and times: Introduction to the special issue. plaNext – Next Generation Planning, 3, 7–15. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt.2016.03.001

ویزای استارتاپ luxury gifts