Downloads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/103Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Simone Tulumello

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Angelo, H., & Vormann, B. (2018). Long waves of urban reform: Putting the smart city in its place. City, 22(5–6), 782–800. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2018.1549850
Arrighi, G. (2010). The long twentieth century: Money, power and the origins of our times (Original work published 1994). London: Verso.
Bates, L. K. (Ed.). (2018). Race and spatial imaginary: Planning otherwise. Planning Theory & Practice, 19(2), 254–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2018.1456816
Buitrago-Sevilla, A. (2022). Against the commons: A radical history of urban planning. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Caruso, N., Hammami, F., Peker, E., Tulumello, S., & Ugur, L. (2016). Differences and connections: Beyond universal theories in planning, urban, and heritage studies. Urban Research and Practice, 9(2), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2016.1174418
Castillo Ulloa, I. (2016). From apophenia to epiphany: Making planning theory-research-practice co-constitutive. plaNext – Next Generation Planning, 3, 16–35. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt.2016.03.002
Cole, S. (2001). Dare to dream: Bridging futures into planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67(4), 373–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360108976246
Doyle, A. (2016). Operationalising resilience within urban planning – Bridging theory and practice. plaNext – Next Generation Planning, 3, 101–113. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt.2016.03.007
Fontana, C. (2016). Hernando de Soto on land titling: Consensus and criticism. plaNext – next generation planning, 3, 36–48. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt.2016.03.003
Gilmore, R. W. (2023). Abolition geography: Essays toward liberation. London: Verso.
Harney, S., & Moten, F. (2013). The undercommons: Fugitive planning and Black study. Wivenhoe: Minor Compositions.
Healey, P. (2012). The universal and the contingent: Some reflections on the transnational flow of planning ideas and practices. Planning Theory, 11(2), 188–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095211419333
Kaika, M., & Ruggiero, L. (2024). Class meets land: The embodied history of land financialization. Oakland: University of California Press.
Levin-Keitel, M. (2016). Systemic constellations in spatial planning processes: A method to visualise questions of power and cultural peculiarities? plaNext – Next Generation Planning, 3, 67–81. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt.2016.03.005
Nadin, V. (2012). International comparative planning methodology: Introduction to the theme issue. Planning Practice & Research, 27(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.669928
Pavoni, A., Pereira, L., & Tulumello, S. (2025). Planning (in) the next century? On the futures of planning that are already here. Journal of Planning Literature, 40(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/08854122241265115
Roy, A. (2009). Strangely familiar: Planning and the worlds of insurgence and informality. Planning Theory, 8(1), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095208099294
Sanchez, T. W., & Nguyen, M. T. (2025). Special issue: “Alternative planning futures: Planning the next century”. Journal of Planning Literature, 40(2), 151–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/08854122251314478
Tulumello, S., & Healey, P. (2016). Questioning planning, connecting places and times: Introduction to the special issue. plaNext – Next Generation Planning, 3, 7–15. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt.2016.03.001