Circular public space as a sociocultural indicator: An exploratory case study situated in the city of Porto

Authors

Downloads

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/129

Published

2026-08-16

Issue

Section

Research article

How to Cite

Circular public space as a sociocultural indicator: An exploratory case study situated in the city of Porto. (2026). plaNext–Next Generation Planning, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/129

Keywords:

circular cities, circular regions, circular economy, food system, indicators, circular public space

Abstract

The transition towards circular cities and regions requires monitoring approaches that extend beyond sectoral and material-flow-based metrics. Existing frameworks for assessing urban circularity remain fragmented and predominantly quantitative, often overlooking sociocultural and territorial dimensions. This article addresses this gap by conceptualizing circular public space as a transversal sociocultural indicator of urban circularity. The study adopts a qualitative comparative research design and examines two initiatives within the urban food system of Porto, Portugal: Good Food Hubs (local organic markets) and Community Composting Islands (community biowaste valorisation). The analysis is structured around the space-flows-actors framework and supported by participant observation, structured surveys, material-flow data, and documentary sources. The findings reveal convergent socio-spatial patterns across the analysed cases, including territorially anchored circular flows, citizen participation, multi-actor cooperation, and the collective appropriation of public space for regenerative purposes. These patterns support the identification of circular public space as an emergent socio-spatial configuration through which circularity becomes visible in everyday urban life. Rather than directly measuring circularity, circular public space operates as an indirect sociocultural indicator that complements conventional monitoring frameworks and offers municipalities, urban planners, and researchers a means of assessing how circularity is socially produced and territorially embedded.

The article is a part of the upcoming special issue "Circular Cities and Regions – Planning for Sustainable Social and Inclusive Communities".

Author Biography

  • Jeff Anderson, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto

    Jeff Anderson is a PhD candidate in Spatial Planning at the Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto (FEUP), with experience in urban sustainability, circular cities, participatory planning, and social innovation. He is a recipient of the Deutsche Bank Urban Age Award and the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation's New Scientific Talent Grant.

References

Bono, F., Wuyts, W., & Willems, E. (2024). Towards a care-full circular economy. Regional Studies Policy Impact Books, 6(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/2578711X.2024.2418230

Bourguignon, D. (2016). Closing the loop: New circular economy package. European Parliament.

Bryman, A. (2016). The nature of quantitative research. In A. Bryman, Social research methods (4th ed., pp. 150–176). Oxford University Press.

Câmara Municipal do Porto. (2017). Roadmap para a cidade do Porto circular em 2030. Câmara Municipal do Porto.

Câmara Municipal do Porto. (2021). Relatório de desenvolvimento sustentável. Câmara Municipal do Porto.

Circle Economy Foundation. (2024). The circularity gap report 2024. Circle Economy Foundation.

Circular Cities Declaration. (2024). CCD report 2024. Circular Cities Declaration.

CityLoops. (2021). Optimised implementation plan – Biowaste. CityLoops.

CityLoops. (2022). Evaluation plan: Biowaste sector, Porto. CityLoops.

CityLoops – Metabolism of Cities. (2020). Metabolism of Cities sector-wide circularity assessment (SCA) method (Deliverable D4.3, Version 2.0). CityLoops.

CityLoops – Metabolism of Cities. (2021). Sector-wide circularity assessment for the biomass sector – Porto. CityLoops.

Dąbrowski, M., & Wandl, A. (2024). Assessing circular economy transitions. Regional Studies Policy Impact Books, 6(1), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/2578711X.2024.2418234

Dąbrowski, M., Williams, J., van den Berghe, K., & Van Bueren, E. (2024). Circular regions and cities: Towards a spatial perspective on circular economy. Regional Studies Policy Impact Books, 6(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/2578711X.2024.2418227

Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2015). Growth within: A circular economy vision for a competitive Europe. Ellen MacArthur Foundation.

Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2017). Cities in the circular economy: An initial exploration. Ellen MacArthur Foundation.

Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2019). Cities and circular economy for food. Ellen MacArthur Foundation.

Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2021). The butterfly diagram: Visualising the circular economy. Ellen MacArthur Foundation.

European Commission. (2023). Circular economy monitoring framework. European Commission.

Ferreira, A. C., & Fuso-Nerini, F. (2019). A framework for implementing and tracking circular economy in cities: The case of Porto. Sustainability, 11(6), 1813. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061813

Flanders. (2023). Circular economy monitor Flanders. Government of Flanders.

Good Food Hubs. (2022). Muda a tua alimentação. Transforma o mundo. Good Food Hubs.

IPCC. (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Lakatos, E. M., & Marconi, M. A. (2003). Fundamentos de metodologia científica. Atlas.

Lefebvre, H. (1974). La production de l’espace. Anthropos.

Loorbach, D., Frantzeskaki, N., & Avelino, F. (2017). Sustainability transitions research: Transforming science and practice for societal change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 42, 599–626. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340

Marin, J., & De Meulder, B. (2018). Interpreting circularity: Circular city representations concealing transition drivers. Sustainability, 10(5), 1420. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051420

PBL – Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. (2023). Integral circular economy report 2023: Assessment for the Netherlands. PBL.

Observatório de Resíduos Lipor. (2023). Indicadores de redução e reutilização Lipor. LIPOR.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2020). The OECD inventory of circular economy indicators. OECD.

Paiho, S., Mäki, E., Wessberg, N., Paavola, M., Tuominen, P., Antikainen, M., Heikkilä, J., Rozado, C., & Jung, N. (2020). Towards circular cities: Conceptualizing core aspects. Sustainable Cities and Society, 59, 102143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102143

Paoli, F., Pirlone, F., & Spadaro, I. (2022). Indicators for the circular city: A review and a proposal. Sustainability, 14(19), 12588. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141911848

PORDATA. (2025). População Porto 2025. Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos.

Porto Ambiente. (2021). Ilhas de compostagem comunitária. Porto Ambiente.

Porto Ambiente. (2023). Mais de sete toneladas de biorresíduos valorizados nos espaços de compostagem comunitária da cidade. Porto Ambiente.

Prendeville, S., Cherim, E., & Bocken, N. (2018). Circular cities: Mapping six cities in transition. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 26, 171–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.03.002

van den Berghe, K., & Dąbrowski, M. (2024). The window of opportunity for circular economy in Europe in the wake of the geopolitical turmoil: Connecting scales and principles. Regional Studies Policy Impact Books, 6(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/2578711X.2024.2418228

Verga, G., & Khan, A. (2022). Space matters: Barriers and enablers for embedding urban circularity practices in the Brussels capital region. Frontiers in Built Environment, 8, 810049. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2022.810049

Williams, J. (2021). Circular cities: A revolution in urban sustainability. Routledge.

Williams, J. (2024). Implementing the circular bioeconomy in metropolitan regions. Regional Studies Policy Impact Books, 6(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/2578711X.2024.2418233