Ethical publishing as resistance: Reflections from plaNext and the politics of knowledge and space

Authors

Downloads

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/104

Keywords:

plaNext, ethical publishing, epistemic justice, resistance, academic freedom

Abstract

What does it mean to publish ethically in a world where knowledge production is shaped by human rights violations, social inequalities, colonial legacies, and systemic exclusions? This reflection draws on ten years of oaexperience with plaNext, an open access journal created by the Young Academics Network of the Association of European Schools of Planning to support early career scholars. It explores how ethical publishing can act as a form of resistance to dominant academic norms, the marginalization of alternative epistemologies, and the politicization of knowledge. Through personal and collective experiences, the article examines plaNext's commitment to academic freedom, equity, decolonisation, and inclusivity, expressed through practices such as voluntary management, half-blind peer review, and a justice-based ethical policy. It also addresses the challenges of sustaining these principles within the constraints of institutional expectations, the publishing industry, and global crises. Ethical publishing, it argues, is not about pretentious neutrality but about taking a principled stance in support of marginalized voices, critical scholarship, and transformative knowledge production. Whether this vision remains viable is an open question that plaNext and many other international journals must continue to examine.

Published

2025-07-05

Issue

Section

Essay

Author Biography

Feras Hammami, University of Gothenburg

Feras Hammami is an urban policy analyst and Associate Professor of Cultural Heritage Conservation at the Department of Conservation, University of Gothenburg. His research explores the intersections of heritage, memory, conflict, and spatial politics, with particular attention to settler colonialism, urban transformation, and the role of heritage in resistance, peacebuilding, and justice. He is also the former Editor-in-Chief of plaNext –– Next Generation Planning.

References

Alam, S. (2024). Trends in research integrity concerns and the evolving role of the publisher. Insights, 37, Article 13. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.663

Allard-Tremblay, Y., & Coburn, E. (2023). The flying heads of settler colonialism; or the ideological erasures of Indigenous peoples in political theorizing. Political Studies, 71(2), 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217211018127

Bacevic, J. (2021). No such thing as sociological excuses? Performativity, rationality and social scientific expertise in late liberalism. European Journal of Social Theory, 24(3), 394–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310211018939

Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary edition). New York: Continuum. (Original work published in 1970)

Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066

Hou, J., & Hammami, F. (2015). On the entangled paths of urban resistance, city planning and heritage conservation. plaNext – Next Generation Planning, 1, 9–16. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt.2015.01.002

Mukhopadhyay, C. & Hammami, F., with Watson, V. (2021) Introduction: Planning theories from ‘southern turn’ to ‘deeply rooted/situated in the South/context’: A project in the making. plaNext – Next Generation Planning, 11, 9–25. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/67

Santos, B. de S. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. Boulder: Paradigm.

Wind, M. (2024). Towers of ivory and steel: How Israeli universities deny Palestinian freedom. London: Verso books.