Grounded futures: A decade of planning through humanitarian and Southern lenses

Authors

Downloads

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/105

Keywords:

humanitarian planning, Global South, participatory methods, inclusive planning, epistemic plurality, planning future

Abstract

This reflective article marks the tenth anniversary of plaNext – Next Generation Planning, tracing its evolution as a critical platform for spatial planning discourse, particularly in humanitarian and Global South contexts. Drawing on personal editorial and field-based experience, the author explores how plaNext has shifted spatial planning discourse toward inclusion, ethics, and contextual sensitivity. Focusing on contributions from Volumes 9 to 11, the article highlights planning’s potential as a transformative tool in humanitarian settings, centering community agency, participatory methods, and interdisciplinary innovation. The analysis further integrates non-Western ethical frameworks, advocating for planning as a reparative and care-based practice, especially relevant in post-crisis urban environments. Contributions from the Global South illustrate planning as a reparative practice rooted in justice, resilience, and relational well-being. Ultimately, the article calls for bridging academic and humanitarian spheres to foster responsive, interdisciplinary, and just planning. The next decade of plaNext offers a chance to consolidate many gains and push further. Thus, the journal’s commitment to fostering a young researchers-driven process is vital for the future of spatial planning.

Published

2025-07-31

Issue

Section

Essay

Author Biography

Batoul Ibrahim, Independent researcher

Urban planner, researcher and humanitarian professional with over eight years of experience in spatial planning, urban development, and humanitarian response. Batoul holds a PhD in Spatial Planning and has worked extensively with international organisations and NGOs in fragile and conflict-affected settings. She specialises in post-conflict recovery, WASH coordination, land administration, and cultural planning.

References

Adam, H., & Rena, R. (2024). Introduction: Polycrisis and economic development in the Global South. In H. Adam & R. Rena (Eds.), Polycrisis and economic development in the Global South (pp. 1–3). London: Routledge.

Adelina, C., Archer, D., Johnson, O., & Opiyo, R. O. (2021). Inclusion in urban environmental governance of small and intermediary cities of the global South. plaNext – Next Generation Planning, 11, 81–105. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/70

Almulhim, A. I., Alverio, G. N., Sharifi, A., et al. (2024). Climate-induced migration in the Global South: An in-depth analysis. npj Climate Action, 3, 47. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-024-00133-1

Costa, G., Costa, H., & Monte-Mór, R. (2021). Rooting metropolitan planning in critical theory and participatory practices: A university planning experience in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. plaNext – Next Generation Planning, 11, 44–61. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/71

Devex Editor. (2020, October 30). In cities of the Global South, resilience is the only way forward. Devex. Retrieved from https://www.devex.com/news/sponsored/in-cities-of-the-global-south-resilience-is-the-only-way-forward-98438

Dörder, P., Ibrahim, B., & Keil, R. (2020). Editorial: Planning inclusive spaces – in a new light. plaNext – Next Generation Planning, 10, 5–9. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/63

Du, D. (2020). Urban Living Lab: What is it, and what is the matter? plaNext – Next Generation Planning, 10, 22–37. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/65

Hertel, S., & Roger, K. (2020). After isolation: Urban planning and the COVID-19 pandemic. Ontario Professional Planners Institute (blog post). Retrieved from https://ontarioplanners.ca/blog/planning-exchange/may-2020/after-isolation-urban-planning-and-the-covid-19-pandemic

Hotakainen, T., & Oikarinen, E. (2019). Balloons to talk about: Exploring conversational potential of an art intervention. plaNext – Next Generation Planning, 9, 45–64. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/59

IFRC. (2025). IFRC ‘Recovery’ overview. Retrieved from https://www.ifrc.org/our-work/disasters-climate-and-crises/recovery

Janssen, C., Daamen, T., & Verdaas, C. (2020). Implementing social sustainability in area development projects in the Netherlands. plaNext – Next Generation Planning, 10, 10–21. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/64

Krisch, A. (2019). Examining cultural planning in Vienna: The discursive institutionalization of social infrastructure in strategic planning. plaNext – Next Generation Planning, 9, 26–44. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/58

Marris, W. (2023). Trauma-informed community change: An exploration of community-led, trauma-informed, prevention-oriented, resilience-building, & healing-centered considerations for strengthening communities. Retrieved from https://www.ctipp.org/post/guide-to-trauma-informed-community-change

Muia, D., Masese, S., & Munene Rufo, B. (2023). Inclusive and participatory community development: Building on Ubuntu to leave no one behind. Australian Journal of Community Work, 3, 79–92.

Mukhopadhyay, C., & Hammami, F., with Watson, V. (2021). Introduction: Planning theories from ‘southern turn’ to ‘deeply rooted/situated in the South/context’: A project in the making. plaNext – Next Generation Planning, 11, 9–25. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/67

Pesce, B. I., & Bagaini, A. (2019). Urban and architectural adaptive strategies for inclusive cities: A review of international innovation experiments. plaNext – Next Generation Planning, 9, 65–82. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/60

Prilenska, V. (2019). Participation game: Reflections on the iterative design process. plaNext – Next Generation Planning, 9, 97–122. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/62

Privitera, E. (2020). The third sector in the planning, production, and regeneration of inclusive public space: Notes from an ongoing experience in a distressed Sicilian neighbourhood. plaNext – Next Generation Planning, 10, 38–57. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/66

Schroeder, K. (2023). Trauma-informed planning: A best-practice framework. PAS QuickNotes 103, American Planning Association. Retrieved from https://www.planning.org/publications/document/9275402/

Silva, P. (2019). Editorial: Planning is about change – Different perspectives on societal challenges. plaNext – Next Generation Planning, 9, 6–10. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/56

Tomateo, C., & Grabowski, Z. (2024). Indigenous justice frameworks for relational ethics in land-based design. Ecosystems and People, 20(1), 2409165. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2024.2409165

United Nations General Assembly. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1). Retrieved from https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

UN-Habitat. (2020). Urban planning responses in post-crisis contexts. Retrieved from https://unhabitat.org/urban-planning-responses-in-post-crisis-contexts

Watson, V. (2014). The case for a Southern perspective in planning theory. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 3(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijepr.2014010103

Williams, R. (2022, November 2). Three models of reparative planning: A comparative analysis [Video and transcript]. Cities@Tufts; Shareable. Retrieved from https://www.shareable.net/cities_tufts/three-models-of-reparative-planning/