Grounded futures: A decade of planning through humanitarian and Southern lenses

Authors

Downloads

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/105

Keywords:

humanitarian planning, Global South, participatory methods, inclusive planning, epistemic plurality, planning future

Abstract

This reflective article marks the tenth anniversary of plaNext – Next Generation Planning, tracing its evolution as a critical platform for spatial planning discourse, particularly in humanitarian and Global South contexts. Drawing on personal editorial and field-based experience, the author explores how plaNext has shifted spatial planning discourse toward inclusion, ethics, and contextual sensitivity. Focusing on contributions from Volumes 9 to 11, the article highlights planning’s potential as a transformative tool in humanitarian settings, centering community agency, participatory methods, and interdisciplinary innovation. The analysis further integrates non-Western ethical frameworks, advocating for planning as a reparative and care-based practice, especially relevant in post-crisis urban environments. Contributions from the Global South illustrate planning as a reparative practice rooted in justice, resilience, and relational well-being. Ultimately, the article calls for bridging academic and humanitarian spheres to foster responsive, interdisciplinary, and just planning. The next decade of plaNext offers a chance to consolidate many gains and push further. Thus, the journal’s commitment to fostering a young researchers-driven process is vital for the future of spatial planning.

Published

2025-07-31

Author Biography

Batoul Ibrahim, Independent researcher

Urban planner, researcher and humanitarian professional with over eight years of experience in spatial planning, urban development, and humanitarian response. Batoul holds a PhD in Spatial Planning and has worked extensively with international organisations and NGOs in fragile and conflict-affected settings. She specialises in post-conflict recovery, WASH coordination, land administration, and cultural planning.

References

Adam, H., & Rena, R. (2024). Introduction: Polycrisis and economic development in the Global South. In H. Adam & R. Rena (Eds.), Polycrisis and economic development in the Global South (pp. 1–3). London: Routledge.

Adelina, C., Archer, D., Johnson, O., & Opiyo, R. O. (2021). Inclusion in urban environmental governance of small and intermediary cities of the global South. plaNext – Next Generation Planning, 11, 81–105. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/70

Almulhim, A. I., Alverio, G. N., Sharifi, A., et al. (2024). Climate-induced migration in the Global South: An in-depth analysis. npj Climate Action, 3, 47. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-024-00133-1

Costa, G., Costa, H., & Monte-Mór, R. (2021). Rooting metropolitan planning in critical theory and participatory practices: A university planning experience in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. plaNext – Next Generation Planning, 11, 44–61. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/71

Devex Editor. (2020, October 30). In cities of the Global South, resilience is the only way forward. Devex. Retrieved from https://www.devex.com/news/sponsored/in-cities-of-the-global-south-resilience-is-the-only-way-forward-98438

Dörder, P., Ibrahim, B., & Keil, R. (2020). Editorial: Planning inclusive spaces – in a new light. plaNext – Next Generation Planning, 10, 5–9. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/63

Du, D. (2020). Urban Living Lab: What is it, and what is the matter? plaNext – Next Generation Planning, 10, 22–37. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/65

Hertel, S., & Roger, K. (2020). After isolation: Urban planning and the COVID-19 pandemic. Ontario Professional Planners Institute (blog post). Retrieved from https://ontarioplanners.ca/blog/planning-exchange/may-2020/after-isolation-urban-planning-and-the-covid-19-pandemic

Hotakainen, T., & Oikarinen, E. (2019). Balloons to talk about: Exploring conversational potential of an art intervention. plaNext – Next Generation Planning, 9, 45–64. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/59

IFRC. (2025). IFRC ‘Recovery’ overview. Retrieved from https://www.ifrc.org/our-work/disasters-climate-and-crises/recovery

Janssen, C., Daamen, T., & Verdaas, C. (2020). Implementing social sustainability in area development projects in the Netherlands. plaNext – Next Generation Planning, 10, 10–21. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/64

Krisch, A. (2019). Examining cultural planning in Vienna: The discursive institutionalization of social infrastructure in strategic planning. plaNext – Next Generation Planning, 9, 26–44. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/58

Marris, W. (2023). Trauma-informed community change: An exploration of community-led, trauma-informed, prevention-oriented, resilience-building, & healing-centered considerations for strengthening communities. Retrieved from https://www.ctipp.org/post/guide-to-trauma-informed-community-change

Muia, D., Masese, S., & Munene Rufo, B. (2023). Inclusive and participatory community development: Building on Ubuntu to leave no one behind. Australian Journal of Community Work, 3, 79–92.

Mukhopadhyay, C., & Hammami, F., with Watson, V. (2021). Introduction: Planning theories from ‘southern turn’ to ‘deeply rooted/situated in the South/context’: A project in the making. plaNext – Next Generation Planning, 11, 9–25. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/67

Pesce, B. I., & Bagaini, A. (2019). Urban and architectural adaptive strategies for inclusive cities: A review of international innovation experiments. plaNext – Next Generation Planning, 9, 65–82. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/60

Prilenska, V. (2019). Participation game: Reflections on the iterative design process. plaNext – Next Generation Planning, 9, 97–122. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/62

Privitera, E. (2020). The third sector in the planning, production, and regeneration of inclusive public space: Notes from an ongoing experience in a distressed Sicilian neighbourhood. plaNext – Next Generation Planning, 10, 38–57. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/66

Schroeder, K. (2023). Trauma-informed planning: A best-practice framework. PAS QuickNotes 103, American Planning Association. Retrieved from https://www.planning.org/publications/document/9275402/

Silva, P. (2019). Editorial: Planning is about change – Different perspectives on societal challenges. plaNext – Next Generation Planning, 9, 6–10. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/56

Tomateo, C., & Grabowski, Z. (2024). Indigenous justice frameworks for relational ethics in land-based design. Ecosystems and People, 20(1), 2409165. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2024.2409165

United Nations General Assembly. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1). Retrieved from https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

UN-Habitat. (2020). Urban planning responses in post-crisis contexts. Retrieved from https://unhabitat.org/urban-planning-responses-in-post-crisis-contexts

Watson, V. (2014). The case for a Southern perspective in planning theory. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 3(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijepr.2014010103

Williams, R. (2022, November 2). Three models of reparative planning: A comparative analysis [Video and transcript]. Cities@Tufts; Shareable. Retrieved from https://www.shareable.net/cities_tufts/three-models-of-reparative-planning/

ویزای استارتاپ luxury gifts