Delving deeper

Considerations on applying empirical research methods to infrastructural urban technology projects

Authors

Downloads

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt.2017.04.006

Keywords:

digital infrastructures, interactive urban technologies

Abstract

Urban technologies are increasingly designed to support ubiquitous computing, which now includes different forms of digitally-augmented interactions in public space. This shift is underpinned by the development and management of digital infrastructures in metropolitan cities – a paradigm often rhetorically dubbed ‘smart cities’. Because the cityscape is uneven and characterized by diversity, this reconfiguration could be seen as a welcome opportunity to renegotiate the issue of agency in relation to the new technologies embedded in the built environment. Since the Urban Screen project was launched in 2005, digital art installations commissioned for public space have offered propitious terrain for rethinking this issue. Developing appropriate research methodologies, which could better support democratic practices within the infrastructural approach to urban technology design still stands out as pressing and necessary to facilitate the engagement of all concerned. This essay argues in favour of multidimensional approaches over unidimensional ones. To ground this discussion, it first describes the results of a unidimensional study carried out in 2015 in Montréal’s Quartier des Spectacles and then highlights some of the salient differences it presents with a multi-sited field study conducted on the same site from 2012-15. It finally concludes that a multidimensional approach seems more robust.

Published

2017-07-01

Issue

Vol. 4 (2017): Social smart cities

Section

Research article

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. London; Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Daigle, P. (2015). Interview with the Common Space Programming Director, October 21, 2015, Quartier des Spectacles Offices, Montréal, Québec.

Dalsgaard, P., & Halskov, K. (2010). Designing urban media façades: Cases and challenges. In proceedings of CHI’10: 28th SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2010 (pp. 2277-2286). New York, NY: ACM Press.

Dourish, P., & Bell, G. (2011). Divining a digital future: Mess and mythology in ubiquitous computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Forlano, L. (2006). Activist infrastructures: The role of community wireless organizations in authenticating the city. Eastbound Journal, 1: 49-66.

Fortin, C. (2016). Harvesting the interactive potential of digital displays in public space: The poetics of public interaction (doctoral dissertation). Simon Fraser University, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada. Retrieved July 4, 2017, from http://summit.sfu.ca/item/15793

Gazzola, H., & Baltazar, A.P. (2015). A hybrid interface for designing and building parklets. In K. S. Willis, A. Aurigi, M. Phillips, & G. Corino (Eds.), Proceedings from MediaCity5 2015: The Fifth International Conference on the EU funded MEDIACITY project (pp. 40-58). Plymouth, UK: Institute of Digital Art & Technology School of Architecture, and Design & Environment, Plymouth University.

Human Futures. (2014). Human Futures Website. Retrieved October 22, 2015, from http://www.humanfutures.info/

Koolhaas, R. (1995). What ever happened to Urbanism? In J. Sigler (Ed.), S,M,L,XL: O.M.A. Rem Koolhaas and Bruce Mau (pp. 959-971). New York, NY: The Monicelli Press.

Kroll, L. (1997). Bio, psycho, socio/eco. 1, Écologies urbaines. Paris: Éditions L’Harmattan. Lamoureux, M. (2013, September 23). Common Space? Humans at the heart of technology: 13 artists, 8 works in the Quartier des Spectacles (press release). Quartier des Spectacles Partnership. Montréal, PQ: Quartier des Spectacles Partnership. Retrieved October 22, 2015, from http://www.quartierdesspectacles.com/en/media/commonspace.

Latzko-Toth, G. (2014). Users as co-designers of software-based media: The co-construction of Internet Relay Chat. Canadian Journal of Communication, 39(4): 577-595.

Montmarquette, L. (2015). Interview with the Common Space Project Coordinator, October 21, 2015, Quartier des Spectacles Offices, Montréal, Québec.

Oliver, J., Savičić, G., & Vasiliev, D. (2011, October). The Critical Engineering Manifesto. Berlin: The Critical Engineering Working Group. Retrieved October 22, 2015, from https://criticalengineering.org/

Pop, S., Toft, T., Calvillo, N., & Wright, M. (Eds.). (2016). What urban media art can do: Why, when, where & how. Stuttgart, Germany: Avedition.

Preiser W. F. E., Rabinowitz H. Z., & White E. T. (1988). Post occupancy evaluation. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Tremblay, L.-R. (2015, October 3). Interactive art in the public space: The Common Space? project. Public talk presented at the Second Mutek_IMG Forum on Current Practices in Digital Practices, Phi Centre, Montréal, Canada.

Viau, N. (2015). Common Space? (press kit). NFB Interactive. Montréal, PQ: National Film Board of Canada. Retrieved October 22, 2015, from http://epkurl.com/commonspace/

Williams, A., Lindtner, S., Anderson, K., & Dourish, P. (2014). Multi-sited design: An analytic lens for transnational HCI. Human-Computer Interaction, 29(1): 78-108.