Downloads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/68Keywords:
Planning, Lacan, Planning Theories, Global South, Hegemony, Western Philosophy, Colonialism, Decoloniality, Lacanian discourse theory, Southern planning theoryAbstract
As a planning theorist who has studied and taught planning theory in the Global South and North, I grapple with the question - "What does planning theory mean in the Global South?" To answer this question, I ontologically investigate the meaning of Southern planning theory based on a Lacanian approach. Drawing on the Lacanian theory of human subjectivity, this article explains how planning theorists’ identities are constituted through their interactions within academia. Lacanian discourse theory assists in exploring how most Southern planning theorists adopt, internalise, and use hegemonic Western philosophy, ideas, and discourses as the only accepted mechanism of truth. Consequently, this process profoundly alienates Southern planning theorists from their local context, as they often devalue, overlook, and neglect non-Western beliefs, ideas, knowledge, and philosophy. I argue that although the number of Southern planning theorists has increased during the last decades, non-Western philosophy is seldom utilised as the core of their critical studies. Based on the Lacanian discourse theory, I show that they mostly remain in the hegemonic mechanism of knowledge production that is embedded in the colonial era.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Mohsen Mohammadzadeh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Askins, K. (2009). ‘That’s just what I do’: Placing emotion in academic activism. Emotion, Space and Society. 2(1): 4-13. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2009.03.005 Alatas, S. F. (2006). Alternative discourses in Asian social science: Responses to Eurocentrism: Sage.
Bhabha, H. K. (2004). The location of culture. London, New York: Routledge.
Bilgin, P. (2004). Whose ‘Middle East’? Geopolitical Inventions and Practices of Security. International Relations, 18(1), 25-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117804041739
Boucher, G. (2006). Bureaucratic speech acts and the university discourse: Lacans theory of modernity. Paper presented at the Jacques Lacan and the other side of psychoanalysis: Reflections on seminar XVII.
Bracher, M. (1988). Lacan’s theory of the four discourses.
Bracher, M. (1999). The Writing Cure. Carbondale: Southern Illinios University.
Brown, T., Atkinson, D., & England, J. (2006). Regulatory discourses in education: A Lacanian perspective: Peter Lang.
Burman, E. (2016). Fanon’s Lacan and the traumatogenic child: Psychoanalytic reflections on the dynamics of colonialism and racism. Theory, Culture & Society, 33(4), 77-101.
Campbell, K. (2004). Jacques Lacan and feminist epistemology. London: Routledge. Clarke, M. (2012). The other side of education: A Lacanian critique of neoliberal education policy. Other Education: The Journal of Educational Alternatives, 1(1), 46-60.
Clarke, M. (2015). ‘Knowledge is power’? A Lacanian entanglement with political ideology in education. Critical Studies in Education, 56(1), 71-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2015.977315.
Clarke, M. (2018). Global South: what does it mean and why use the term? Global South Political Commentaries. Retrieved from https://onlineacademiccommunity.uvic.ca/globalsouthpolitics/2018/08/08/global-south-what-does-it-mean-and-why-use-the-term/
Comaroff, J., & Comaroff, J. L. (2012). Theory from the South: Or, how Euro-America is evolving toward Africa. Anthropological Forum 22(2):113-131. DOI: 10.1080/00664677.2012.694169
Connell, R. (2007). Southern theory: the global dynamics of knowledge in social science: Crows Nest, NSW, Australia : Allen & Unwin. 2007.
Connell, R. (2014). Using southern theory: Decolonizing social thought in theory, research and application. Planning Theory, 13(2), 210-223.
Dabashi, H. (2015). Can non-Europeans think? London: Zed Books Ltd.
Dados, N., & Connell, R. (2012). The global south. Contexts, 11(1), 12-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1536504212436479.
De Satgé, R., & Watson, V. (2018). Urban planning in the Global South : Springer.
Dean, T. (2000). Beyond sexuality. Chicago: University of Chicago
Declercq, F. (2006). Lacan on the capitalist discourse. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, 11(1), 74-83. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.pcs.2100068
Dei, G. J. S. (2014). The African scholar in the western academy. Journal of Black Studies, 45(3), 167-179. DOI: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24572948
Easthope, A. (1998). Homi Bhabha, hybridity and identity, or Derrida versus Lacan. Hungarian Journal of English and American Studies (HJEAS), 4(1/2), 145-151.
Edensor, T., & Jayne, M. (2012). Urban theory beyond the West: a world of cities. New York. London: Routledge.
Elliott, A. (2019). Social theory and psychoanalysis in transition: Routledge.
Evans, D. (2010). An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psuchoanalysis. London: Routledge.
Fanon, F. (2008 [1952]). Black skin, white masks (New ed.. ed.). London: Pluto Press
Fink, B. (2002). Knowledge and jouissance. In Reading seminar XX: Lacan’s major work on love, knowledge and feminine sexuality (pp. 45-53). New YORK: SUNY Press.
Fink, B. (2018). The master signifier and the four discourses. In Key concepts of Lacanian psychoanalysis (pp. 29-47): Routledge.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge. New York: Vintage Books.
Foucault, M. (1998). On the ways of writing history. Aesthetics, method, and epistemology, 279, 295.
Friedmann, J. (1987). Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Friedmann, J. (2008). The Uses of Planning Theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28(2), 247-257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X08325220 Friedmann, J. (2011). Insurgencies: Essays in Planning Theory. New York: Routledge Glowinski, H., Marks, Z. M., & Murphy, S. (2001). A compendium of Lacanian terms: Free Association Books London.
Grigg, R. (1993). Lacan’s four discourses. Analysis (4), 33. Acessed from https://www.nida.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/41783/March-Seminar-2018-Lacans-Theory-of-Four-Discourses.pdf.
Gunder, M. (2003). Planning Policy Formulation from a Lacanian Perspective. International Planning Studies, 8(3), 279-294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1356347032000153124.
Gunder, M. (2004). Shaping the planner’s Ego-Ideal. Planning Education and Research, 23(3), 299-311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X03261284.
Gunder, M. (2010). Planning as the Ideology of (Neo-Liberal)Space. Planning Theory, 9(4), 298–314. DOI: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26004239.
Gunder, M. (2011). A metapsychological exploration of the role of popular media in
engineering public belief on planning issues. Planning Theory, 10(4), 325-343. DOI: ttps://ezproxy.ub.gu.se/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/26165874
Gunder, M. (2016). Planning’s “failure” to ensure efficient market delivery. European Planning Studies, 24(1), 21-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1067291.
Gunder, M., & Hillier, J. (2009). Planning in Ten Words or Less. Farnham: Ashgate Gunder, M., Madanipour, A., & Watson, V. (2018). PLANNING THEORY: An Introduction. In M. Gunder, A. Madanipour, & V. Watson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of planning theory (First edition ed., pp. 1- 12). New York, London: Taylor and Francis
Hall, P. G. (2007). Cities of tomorrow: Wiley-Blackwell.
Healey, P. (2012). The universal and the contingent. Planning Theory, 11(2), 188-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095211419333.
Hillier, J., & Gunder, M. (2003). Planning Fantasies? Planning Theory, 2(3), 225–248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/147309520323005.
Hillier, J., & Gunder, M. (2005). Not over your dead bodies! A Lacanian interpretation of urban planning discourse and practice. Environment and Planning A, 37(6), 1049-1066. DOI: Not over your dead bodies! A Lacanian interpretation of urban planning discourse and practice.
Homer, S. (2005). Jacques Lacan: Routledge.
Hountondji, P. J. (2002). Knowledge appropriation in a post-colonial context. Indigenous
knowledge and the integration of knowledge systems: Towards a philosophy of articulation, 137-142. Claremont, South Africa: New Africa Books.
Jabri, V. (2013). The Postcolonial Subject: Claiming politics/governing others in late modernity. Routledge.
Jagodzinski, J. (2004). A Lacanian Approach to Media. In J. Jagodzinski (Ed.), Youth Fantasies: The Perverse Landscape of the Media (pp. 49-66). New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.
Kouri, S., & Skott-Myhre, H. (2016). Catastrophe: A transversal mapping of colonialism and settler subjectivity. Settler Colonial Studies, 6(3), 279-294. DOI: 10.1080/2201473X.2015.1061967.
Krips, H. (2004). Couching politics: Žižek’s rules for radicals. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, 9(1), 126-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.pcs.2100005.
Lacan, J. (1988). The seminar (Vol. Book I). Cambridge Cambridge University Press. Lacan, J. (2006). Ecrits (B. Fink, Trans.). London: Norton & Company.
Lacan, J. (2007). The Other Side of Psychoanalysis. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XVII (R. Grigg, Trans.). In: New York: Norton and Co.
Mahbubani, K. (2010). Can Asians Think?: Marshall Cavendish International Asia Pte Ltd. Meyer, J. W. (2000). Globalization: Sources and Effects on National States and Societies. International Sociology, 15(2), 233-248. DOI: 10.1177/0268580900015002006
Mignolo, W. D. (2007). Delinking: The rhetoric of modernity, the logic of coloniality and the grammar of decoloniality. Cultural studies, 21(2-3), 449-514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162647.
Mignolo, W. D. (2017). Coloniality is far from over, and so must be decoloniality. Afterall, 43(1), 38-45. Accessed from https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/692552.
Mignolo, W. D., & Walsh, C. E. (2018). On decoloniality: Concepts, analytics, praxis. Duke University Press.
Muller, J. (2000). The origins and Self-Serving Functions of the Ego. In The subject of Lacan: SUNY Press.
Njoh, A. J. (2010). Europeans, modern urban planning and the acculturation of ‘racial others’. Planning Theory, 9(4), 369-378. DOI: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26004243. Oldfield, S., & Parnell, S. (2014). From the south. In The Routledge handbook on cities of the global south (pp. 23-26): Routledge.
Olivier, B. (2009). Lacan on the discourse of capitalism. Phronimon, 10(1), 25-42.
Porter, L. (2010). Unlearning the colonial cultures of planning: Ashgate Publishing Ltd. Quijano, A. (2007). Coloniality and modernity/rationality. Cultural studies, 21(2-3), 168-178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601164353
Richardson, T. (2002). Freedom and control in planning: Using discourse in the pursuit of reflexive practice. Planning Theory & Practice, 3(3), 353-361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350214953.
Roy, A., & Ong, A. (2011). Worlding cities: John Wiley & Sons.
Salecl, R. (1994). Deference to the great other: New York University Press.
Schroeder, J. L. (2000). The Four Discourses of Law: A Lacanian Analysis of Legal Practice and Scholarship. Tex. L. Rev., 79, 15.
Schroeder, J. L. (2008). The four Lacanian discourses: Or turning law inside out: Birkbeck Law Press.
Spivak, G. C. (1999). A Critique of Post-colonial Reason: Toward a history of the vanishing present. Harvard university press.
Sturrock, J. (2003). Structuralism: Wiley-Blackwell.
Teixeira, M. (2018). Master-Slave Dialectics (in the Colonies). Krisis(2). Accessed from https://archive.krisis.eu/master-slave-dialectics-of-the-colonies/.
Thakur, G. B., & Dickstein, J. M. (2018). Lacan and the Nonhuman: Springer.
Tlostanova, M. (2019). The post-colonial condition, the decolonial option, and the post-socialist intervention. In Cross-Examined (pp. 165- 178): Routledge.
Vainer, C. (2014). Disseminating ‘best practice’? The coloniality of urban knowledge and city models. In The Routledge handbook on cities of the global south (pp. 70-78): Routledge.
Vanheule, S. (2016). Capitalist discourse, subjectivity and Lacanian psychoanalysis. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 1948. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01948.
Verhaeghe, P. (1995). From impossibility to inability: Lacan’s theory on the four discourses’. The Letter: Lacanian Perspectives on Psychoanalysis, 3(Spring), 91-108. DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-255818.
Verhaeghe, P. (1998). Causation and Destitution of a Pre-ontological Non-entity: On the Lacanian Subject. In Key concepts of Lacanian psychoanalysis (pp. 164-189). London: Rebus press.
Vieira, M. (2019). The decolonial subject and the problem of non-Western authenticity. Post-colonial Studies, 22(2), 150-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2019.1608795.
Watson, V. (2004). Commentaries: Teaching planning in a context of diversity. Planning Theory & Practice, 5(2), 252-254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1464935042000225599.
Watson, V. (2014). The case for a southern perspective in planning theory. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 3(1), 23-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/ijepr.2014010103.
Watson, V. (2016). Shifting approaches to planning theory: Global North and South. Urban Planning, 1(4), 32-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v1i4.727.
Winkler, T. (2018). Black texts on white paper: Learning to see resistant texts as an approach towards decolonising planning. Planning Theory, 17(4), 588-604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095217739335
Yiftachel, O. (2000). Social Control, Urban Planning and Ethno-class Relations. International journal of urban and regional research, 24(2), 418-438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00255.
Žižek, S. (2016). Can One Exit From the Capitalist Discourse Without Becoming a Saint. Crisis and Critique, 3(3), 2016. Accessed from http://crisiscritique.org/political11/Slavoj.pdf.
Žižek, S. (2017). The Varieties of Surplus. Problemi International, 1(1), 7-32. Accessed from https://problemi.si/issues/p2017-1/01problemi_international_2017_1_zizek.pdf.
Zupančič, A. (2006). When surplus enjoyment meets surplus value. In J. Clemens & R. Grigg (Eds.), Jacques Lacan and the other side of psychoanalysis (pp. 155–178). Durham Duke University Press.
