Legacies of mistrust

Why colonial imprints on the implementation of fiscal reforms in Mozambique and Mexico matter


  • Gabriella Y. Carolini Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Sarra Lynn Hess Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean





fiscal decentralization, Mozambique, Mexico, colonialism, racism


National authorities across Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africa have implemented various forms of fiscal decentralization over the past three decades with equivocal results. The design of such reforms haslong rested on theories based on the experiences of high-income countries’ efforts at increasing local autonomy, accountability, and basic service efficiencies.  Critics of the global advocacy for fiscal decentralization, however, point to several challenges with its implementation across diverse political economies that differ significantly from those in high-income environments.  Nonetheless, these critiques often obscure the impact that colonial regimes and their legacies have on current efforts to fiscally decentralize.  In two post-colonial environments where fiscal decentralization projects have unrolled, namely Mozambique and Mexico, we show how colonial imprints remain critical to understanding efforts at fiscal decentralization. Our focus in these cases is on how race-based caste systems introduced under colonial administrations fed the development and evolution of dual governance systems across spaces and peoples that bred mistrust between residents, local authorities and central authorities. We argue that the conflicting rationales in evidence between stakeholders involved in fiscal decentralization projects today are rooted in the social mistrust and power struggles born from these colonial experiences.  In conclusion, we contend that fiscal decentralization reforms must explicitly grapple with these spatialized and racialized legacies of mistrust and the diverse rationalities guiding stakeholders in both the design and evaluation of public policies meant to strengthen local autonomy,transparency, and efficiencies.




Allen, A. & Wesely, J. (2020). Urban pedagogies: How do we learn and practice urban equality? In the KNOW Newsletter 3, 6–9. Knowledge in Action for Urban Equality. Retrieved May 28, 2020, from https://indd.adobe.com/view/f98557e6-c9df-47ec-8a8d-6100127293cd

Bahl, R., 2008. Opportunities and Risks of Fiscal Decentralization: A Developing Country Perspective, in: Fiscal Decentralization and Land Policies. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA.

Bleck, J., van de Walle, N., 2018. Electoral Politics in Africa since 1990: Continuity in Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/DOI:10.1017/9781316676936

Bueno, N., 2019. Reconciliation in Mozambique: was it ever achieved? Confl. Secur. Dev. 19, 427–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2019.1663037

Bunk, B., 2018. The dynamics of donor and domestic elite interaction in Mozambique: formal decentralisation and informal power structures. Confl. Secur. Dev. 18, 321–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2018.1483555

Burgess, K., 2005. Migrant Philanthropy and local governance in Mexico, in: New Patterns for Mexico: Remittances, Philanthropic Giving, and Equitable Development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 99–123.

Burton, A., Jennings, M., 2007. Introduction: The Emperor’s New Clothes? Continuities in Governance in Late Colonial and Early Postcolonial East Africa. The International Journal of African Historical Studies 40, 1–25. DOI: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40034788.

Buur, L., Kyed, H.M., 2006. Contested Sources of Authority: Re-claiming State Sovereignty

by Formalizing Traditional Authority in Mozambique. Dev. Change 37, 847–869. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2006.00504.x

Cabannes, Y. 2018. The contribution of participatory budgeting to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals: lessons for policy in Commonwealth countries. Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance, ID-6707

Cahen, M. 2011. The Enemy as Model Patronage as a Crisis Factorin Constructing Opposition in Mozambique. OXPO Working Paper. Oxford-Sciences Po Research Group: Oxford, UK.

Cantu de la Cruz, M., 2003. La Coordinación Fiscal, Hacia una visión integral. Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Nuevo León, Mexico.

Carolini, G.Y., 2015. Valuing possibility: South-south cooperation and participatory budgeting in Maputo, Mozambique, Urban Planning in Sub-Saharan Africa: Colonial and Post-Colonial Planning Cultures. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315797311

Carolini, G.Y., Hess, S.L., Quezada Medina, J., Otto Thomasz, E., 2019. Panorama de la descentralización fiscal y la ruralidad en América Latina y el Caribe: limitaciones y oportunidades para resolver el desarrollo desigual (No. LC/MEX/TS.2019/24). Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean.

CONEVAL (Consejo Naiconal de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social), 2020.

Criterios generales para la determinación de las zonas de atención prioriataria, 2020. CONEVAL (Consejo Naiconal de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social), 2013.

Programa para el Desarrollo de Zonas Prioritarias, Ficha de Monitoreo 2012-2013. Cornwall, A., 2002. Making spaces, changing places: situating participation in development (No. 170), IDS Working Paper. Sussex.

Duquette-Rury, L., 2015. Collective Remittances and Transnational Coproduction: The 3x1 Program for Migrants and Household Access to Public Goods in Mexico. UCLA: International Institute.

ECLAC (Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean), 2018. Desarrollo e igualdad: el pensamiento de la CEPAL en su séptimo deceno. Edited by R. Bielschowsky and M. Torres. United Nations: Santiago.

Economist Intelligence Unit, 2020. Democracy Index 2019: A year of democratic setbacks and popular protest.

Ekeh, P.P., 1975. Colonialism and the two publics in Africa: A theoretical statement. Comp. Stud. Soc. Hist. 17, 91–112. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429502538

Erk, J., 2015. Iron Houses in the Tropical Heat: Decentralization Reforms in Africa and their Consequences. Reg. Fed. Stud. 25, 409–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2015.1114921

Erk, J., 2014. Federalism and Decentralization in Sub-Saharan Africa: Five Patterns of Evolution. Reg. Fed. Stud. 24, 535–552.

Escobar Latapí, L., 2012. Ley de Coordinación Fiscal ¿Es la que necesitamos? Colegio de Contadores Públicos de México.

Falleti, T. G., 2010. Decentralization and Subnational Politics in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ferrant, C., 2018. Understanding Decentralization in Mozambique with a Ziblatt-Mann Framework. E-Int. Relat. 1–6.

Filipe, C.B., 2019. Decentralização fiscal sem enquadramento no context actual das finanças públicas. Maputo, Mozambique.

Fox, J., 1994. The Difficult Transition from Clientelism to Citizenship: Lessons from Mexico, World Politics 46, pp. 151-184.

Gonçalves, E. 2013. Orientacoes superiores: Time and bureaucratic authority in Mozambique, African Affairs. 112(449):602-622.

Hamann, V., 2007. The Impact of International Labor Migration on Regional Development: The Example of Zacatecas, Mexico. Kassell University Press, Kassell.

Hiskey, J.T., 2010. The promise of decentralised governance. Mak. Decentralization Work Democr. Dev. Secur. Lond. Lynne Rienner Publ. 25–46.


Isaacman, B. and Isaacman, A. 2018. Mozambique: From Colonialism To Revolution, 1900-1982. Routledge: London.

Iskander, N. 2005. Social learning as a productive project: The Tres por Uno (three for one) experience at Zacatecas, Mexico, Chapter 14 in Migration, Remittances and Development. OECD Publishing.


Layson, H., Ross, C., Boyer, C., 2017. Caste and Politics in the Struggle for Mexican Independence.

Lopez, S.L., 2009. Migrant Remittances and the Mexican State: An emergent transnational development model? (No. 2008- 2009.37), ISSC Working Paper Series. University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.

Macamo, E., 2017. Power, conflict, and citizenship: Mozambique’s contemporary struggles. Citizsh. Stud. 21, 196–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2017.1279796

Macamo, E., 2014. Cultura Política e Cidadania em Moçambique: Uma Relação Conflituosa, in: de Brito, L., Nuno Castel-Branco, C., Chichava, S., Forquilha, S., Francisco, A. (Eds.), Desafios Para Moçambique 2014. IESE, Maputo, Mozambique.

Malone, A., Durden, T.E., 2018. Who Drives Diaspora Development? Replication of Mexico’s 3x1 Program in Yucátan. J. Lat. Am. Geogr. 17, 139–165.

Mamdani, M., 1996. Citizens and Subjects: Contemporary Africa and the Legacy of Late Colonialism. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

Miraftab, F., 2009. Insurgent Planning: Situating Radical Planning in the Global South. Plan. Theory 8, 32–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119084679.ch24

Nylen, W.R., 2014. Participatory Budgeting in a Competitive- Authoritarian Regime: A Case

Study (Maputo, Mozambique) (No. 13E/2014), Cadernos. Maputo, Mozambique. O’Laughlin, B., 2000. Class and the Customary: The Ambiguous Legacy of the “Indigenato” in Mozambique. Afr. Aff. 99, 5–42.

Penvenne, J.M., 1981. Chibalo e classe operaria: Lourenco Marques 1870-1962. Estud. Mocambicanos 2, 9–26.

Prud’homme, R., 1995. The Dangers of Decentralization. World Bank Res. Obs. 10, 201–20. Quembo, C.D., 2012. O poder do poder: Operação Produção (1983) e a produção dos “improdutivos” urbanos no Moçambique pós-colonial. Cad. Hist. Moçamb. 1, 65–81. Rocha Menocal, A., 2007. Program 3x1 para Migrantes. EuropeAid Co-operation Office,

Fundación Internacional y para Iberoamérica de Administración y Políticas Públicas. Schneider, L., 2006. Colonial Legacies and Postcolonial Authoritarianism in Tanzania: Connects and Disconnects. Afr. Stud. Rev. 49, 93–118. https://doi.org/DOI:10.1353/arw.2006.0091

SEDESOL (Secretaria de Desarrollo Social), 2015. Programa para el Desarrollo de Zonas Prioritarias Cobertura 2015.

Sihlongonyane, M.F., 2015. Empty Signifiers of Transformation in Participatory Planning and the Marginalization of Black People in South Africa. Plan. Pract. Res. 30, 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2015.1008803

Simpser, A., Duquett-Rury, L., Hernández Company, J.A., Ibarra, J.F., 2016. The Political Economy of Social Spending by Local Government: A Study of the 3x1 Program in Mexico. Lat. Am. Res. Rev. 51, 62–83.

Sintomer, Y., Herzberg, C., Allegretti, G., Röcke, A., & Alves, M. L. 2013. Participatory budgeting worldwide. Dialog Global, (25), 1-93.

Smith, H.J.M., Revell, K.D., 2016. Micro-Incentives and Municipal Behavior: Political Decentralization and Fiscal Federalism in Argentina and Mexico. World Dev. 77, 231–248.

Smoke, P. (2015). Rethinking Decentralization: Assessing Challenges to a Popular Public Sector Reform. Public Administration and Development, 35, 97–112.

Tanzi, V., 2001. Pitfalls on the Road to Fiscal Decentralization (No. 19). Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Vines, A., 2013. Renamo’s Rise and Decline: The Politics of Reintegration in Mozambique. Int. Peacekeeping 20, 375–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2013.840087

von Braun, J., Grote, U., 2000. Does Decentralization Serve the Poor?, IMF Conference on Fiscal Descentralization. Center for Development Research University of Bonn, Washington, DC.

Watson, V., 2003. Conflicting rationalities: Implications for planning theory and ethics. Plan. Theory Pract. 4, 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464935032000146318

Weimer, B., 2012. Municipal Tax Base in Mozambique: High Potential - Low Degree of Utilisation (No. 1), Discussion Paper.

Weimer, B., Carrilho, J., 2017. Political Economy of Decentralisation in Mozambique. IESE, Maputo, Mozambique.

World Bank. 2018. Approach Paper: Evaluation of the World Bank Group Engagement on Strengthening Subnational Governments. Independent Evaluation Group. World Bank: Washington, D.C.

Worthen, H. 2015. Indigenous Women’s Political Participation: Gendered Labor and Collective Rights Paradigms in Mexico, Gender and Society, Vol. 29, No. 6: 914-936. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243215602103.

Wunsch, J., 2014. Decentralization: Theoretical, Conceptual, and Analytical Issues, in: Decentralization in Africa: The Paradox of State Strength. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder, CO.