How power relationships are involved in research methods

Authors

Downloads

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/43

Keywords:

Research methods, Activist research, Power, Community-based participatory action research, Participatory action research, Virtual and augmented reality

Abstract

With the rise of activism and activist research, this paper explores how power relationships are involved in traditional and emerging methods used in research on activism. This question matters as research methods have the potential to both improve the capacities of activist groups and enhance knowledge of agents involved: researcher and activist. The added value of the paper is that it presents a range of methods used in research on activism, including new methods that are relatively uncommon in planning research. The second contribution of this paper is that it is based on a power framework by Forester; it analyses how power is embedded in the use of a particular research method. The authors find extant differences between the methodologies when analyzed through this framework, especially in their potential to involve with activist communities. The authors encourage researchers to be braver in using activist research methods and to be aware of the underlying power discourses in their choices.

Published

2019-07-01

Issue

Vol. 8 (2019): Making space for hope

Section

Research article

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Alsaawi, A. (2014). A critical review of qualitative interviews. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences. 3(4): 149-156.

Baarda, D. B., Bakker, E., Fischer, T., Julsing, M., Goede, M. P. M., Peters, V. A. M., & van der Velden, T. M. (2013). Basisboek kwalitatief onderzoek: handleiding voor het opzetten en uitvoeren van kwalitatief onderzoek. Groningen: NoordhoffUitgevers.

Baarda, D. B., de Goede, M. P., & van Dijkum, C. (2014). Basisboek statistiek met SPSS. Groningen: Noordhoff.

Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Burns, J. C., Cooke, D. Y., & Schweidler, C. (2011). A Short Guide to Community Based Participatory Action Research. Los Angeles: Advancement Project – Healthy City.

Cancian, F. M. (1993). Conflicts Between Activist Research and Academic Success: Participatory Research and Alternative Strategies. The American Sociologist/Spring. 24(1): 92-106.

Choi, B. C., & Pak, A. W. (2005). A catalog of biases in questionnaires. Preventing Chronic Disease. 2(1): A13.

Denzin, N.K. (2001) The reflexive interview and a performative social science. Qualitative Research. 1(1): 23-46.

DeWalt, K. M. & DeWalt, B. R. (2011). Participant Observation: A Guide for Fieldworkers. Lanham: AltaMiraPress.

Forester, J. (1988). Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Gaventa, J. & Cornwall, A. (2015). Power and Knowledge. In H. Bradbury-Huang (Ed.), The Sage Handbook of Action Research (pp. 465-471). Los Angeles: Sage.

Ginwright, S., & Cammarota, J. (2007). Youth activism in the urban community: Learning critical civic praxis within community organizations. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 20(6): 693-710.

Hall, B. L. (1992). From margins to center: The development and purpose of participatory research. American Sociologist. 23(4): 15-28.

Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2010). Qualitative Research Methods. Cheltendham: Sage.

Jansen, H. (2010). The logic of qualitative survey research and its position in the field of social research methods. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 11(2): art. 11.

Kaase, M. (1999). Interpersonal trust, political trust and non‐institutionalised political participation in Western Europe. West European Politics. 22(3): 1-21.

Kim-Ju, G., Mark, G. Y., Cohen, R., Garcia-Santiago, O., & Nguyen, P. (2008). Community mobilization and its application to youth violence prevention. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 34(3): S5-S12.

King, N., & Horrocks, C. (2010). Interviews in Qualitative Research. London: Sage.

Knigge, L. (2009). Intersections between public and private: community gardens, community service and geographies of care in the US City of Buffalo, NY. Geographica Helvetica. 64(1): 45-52.

Levinson, M. (2017). When participants don’t wish to participate in participatory action research, and when others participate on their behalf: The representation of communities by real and faux participants. The Urban Review. 49(3): 382-399.

Minkler M, & Wallerstein M, (2003). Community based participatory research for health. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Mould, O. (2014). Tactical Urbanism: The New Vernacular of the Creative City. Geography Compass. 8(8): 529-539.

Natapov, A. & Fisher-Gewirtzman, D. (2016). Visibility of urban activities and pedestrian routes: An experiment in a virtual environment. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 58: 60-70.

Nunkoosing, K. (2005). The problems with interviews. Qualitative Health Research. 15(5): 698-706.

Ochocka, J., Moorlag, E., & Janzen, R. (2010). A framework for entry: PAR values and engagement strategies in community research. Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement. 3(1) [online].

Peck, J. (2012). Austerity urbanism. City. 16(6): 626-655.

Portman, M.E., Natapov, A., Fisher-Gewirtzman, D. (2015). To go where no man has gone before: Virtual reality in architecture, landscape architecture and environmental planning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 54: 376-384.

Psotka, J. (1995). Immersive training systems: Virtual reality and education and training. Instructional Science. 23: 405-431.

Rooney, P. M., Mesch, D. J., Chin, W., & Steinberg, K. S. (2005). The effects of race, gender, and survey methodologies on giving in the US. Economics Letters. 86(2): 173-180.

Roy, K. (2005). Power and resistance: insurgent spaces, Deleuze, and curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing. 21(1): 27-38 .

Sager, T. (2016). Activist planning: a response to the woes of neo-liberalism? European Planning Studies. 24(7): 1262-1280.

Scardaville, M. C. (2005). Accidental activists: Fan activism in the soap opera community. American Behavioral Scientist. 48(7): 881-901.

Schoene, M. (2017). Urban continent, urban activism? European cities and social movement activism. Global Society. 31(3): 370-391.

Scholl, B. (2017). Building Actor Relationships and Alliances for Complex Problem Solving in Spatial Planning: The Test Planning Method. disP - The Planning Review. 53(1): 46-56.

Shallwani, S. & Mohammed, S. (2007). Community-Based Participatory Research. A Training Manual for Community-Based Researchers. Retrieved June 18, 2019, from https://www.livingknowledge.org/fileadmin/Dateien-Living-Knowledge/Dokumente_Dateien/Toolbox/LK_A_Training_manual.pdf.

Silva, P. (2016). Tactical urbanism: Towards an evolutionary cities’ approach? Environment and Planning B. 43(6): 1040-1051.

Simonsen, J., Svabo, C., Strandvad, S. M., Hansen, O. E., Samson, K., Hertzum, M. & Jansen O. E. (2014). Situated Design Methods. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Tait, M. & Campbell, H. (2000). The politics of communication between planning officers andpoliticians: the exercise of power through discourse. Environment and Planning A, 32(3): 489-506.

Vaart, G. V. D., Hoven, B. V., & Huigen, P. P. (2018). Creative and Arts-Based Research Methods in Academic Research: Lessons from a Participatory Research Project in the Netherlands. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 19(2): art. 30.

Wallerstein, N. B. & Duran, B. (2006). Using Community-Based Participatory Research to Address Health Disparities. Health Promotion Practice. 7(3): 312-323.