Downloads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/57Keywords:
autonomous driving, policy-making, argumentative discourse analysis (ADA), actor network theory (ANT)Abstract
This commentary proposes a methodological approach about policy analysis on autonomous driving. It focuses on the role of discourse, the multiple actors and technologies involved in the processes of urban policy-making. Autonomous driving is considered a crucial case of policy-making in cities, because of the multitude of established and new actors involved as well as the combination of different digitalisation and automation technologies. Current research outlines the uncertainty planners and policymakers find themselves in regarding how to plan and regulate for autonomous driving, and calls for the need of finding the right forms of governance and policy for the implementation of autonomous driving in urban contexts. Therefore, studying the processes of its policy in the making is vital, as it is these processes that determine if and how any kind of policy will come into place. Subsequently, it is urban policy that will define the ways autonomous driving will be implemented and its implications in cities. Since both socio-political and material factors play a role in policy-making, a suitable methodological approach is needed that can address both. Therefore, this commentary discusses methodological developments drawing inspiration from Argumentative Discourse Analysis (ADA) and combining it with elements from Actor-Network-Theory (ANT). The insights provided by the commentary aim at a more comprehensive and thorough understanding of policy-making processes of autonomous driving and how policy change occurs (or not).
Published
Issue
Section
References
Beveridge, R. (2012). A Politics of Inevitability. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften..
Bissell, D. (2018). Automation interrupted: How autonomous vehicle accidents transform the material politics of automation, Political Geography. Elsevier, 65, pp. 57–66.
Blyth, P. L. (2019). Of Cyberliberation and Forbidden Fornication: Hidden Transcripts of Autonomous Mobility in Finland, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. Elsevier, 71, 236–247.
Callon, M. (1984). Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay, The Sociological Review. SAGE Publications Ltd, 32(1_suppl), 196–233.
Callon, M. (1986). The sociology of an actor network: the case of electric vehicle, In M. Callon, J. Law & A. Rip (Eds.), Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World (pp. 19–34), London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Elliott, A. (2018). Automated mobilities: From weaponized drones to killer bots, Journal of Sociology. 00(0):1-17.
Fischer, F., & Forester, J. (1993). The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Durham: Duke University Press Books.
Fischer, F. & Gottweis, H. (2012). Introduction, The Argumentative Turn Revisited. Durham: Duke University Press.
Fraedrich, E., Beiker, S., & Lenz, B. (2015). Transition pathways to fully automated driving and its implications for the sociotechnical system of automobility, European Journal of Futures Research, 3(11), 1–11.
Freudendal-Pedersen, M., Kesselring, S. & Servou, E. (2019). What is Smart for the Future City? Mobilities and Automation, Sustainability, 11(1):1-21.
Gomart, E., & Hajer, M. (2003). Is That Politics?, In B. Joerges, Nowortny H. (Ed.), Social Studies of Science and Technology: Looking Back, Ahead (pp. 33-61). Sociology of the Sciences: Vol 23, Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer
Hajer, M. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford: University Press.
Hajer, M. (2003). ‘A frame in the fields: Policymaking and the reinvention of politics’. In M. Hajer & H. Wagenaar (Ed.), Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society (pp. 88-110). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hajer, M. A. (1993). Discourse Coalitions and the Institutionalization of Practice: The Case of Acid Rain in Britain. In F. Fischer & J. Forester (Ed.) The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning (pp. 43–75). Durham & London, UK: Duke University Press
Hajer, M. A. (2005a). Coalitions, Practices, and Meaning in Environmental Politics: From Acid Rain to BSE. In D. Howarth & J. Torfing (Ed.), Discourse Theory in European Politics: Identity, Policy and Governance (pp. 297–315). Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave MacmillanHajer, M. A. (2005b). Setting the stage: A dramaturgy of policy deliberation, Administration and Society, 36(6), 624–647.
Hajer, M. A. (2006). Doing discourse analysis: coalitions, practices, meaning. In M. van den Brink & T. Metze (Ed.), Words matter in policy and planning- Discourse theory and method in the social sciences, (pp. 65–74), Utrecht, The Netherlands: Geographical Studies.
Hajer, M. A. (2009). Authoritative governance. Policy Making in the Age of Mediatization. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2005). Performing governance through networks, European Political Science, 4(3), 340–347.
Jasanoff, S. (2004). Ordering knowledge, ordering society. In S. Jasanoff (Ed.), States of Knowledge: The Co-production of science and social order (pp. 13-45), London and New York: Routledge.
Johnson, A. (2016). Environmental regulation and technological development in the U.S. auto industry. The causes and consequences for sustained economic development, 1–26. Retrieved November 13, 2017, from www.equitablegrowth.org.
Kellerman, A. (2018). Automated and autonomous spatial mobilities. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing (Transport, mobilities and spatial change).
Kr ger, F. (2016). Automated Driving in Its Social, Historical and Cultural Contexts. In M. Maurer., J. C. Gerdes, B. Lenz, H. Winner (Ed), Autonomous Driving: Technical, Legal and Social Aspects (pp. 41–68). Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Latour, B. (1996). Aramis, or, The Love of Technology. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity, Systems Practice, 5(4), 379–393.
Law, J. (1999). After Ant: Complexity, Naming and Topology, The Sociological Review. SAGE, 47(1_suppl), pp. 1–14.
Legacy, C., Ashmore, D., Scheurer, J., Stone, J., Curtis, C. (2019). Planning the driverless city, Transport Reviews. Taylor & Francis, 39(1), 84–102.
Lipson, H., & Kurman, M. (2016). Driverless: Intelligent Cars and the Road Ahead. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Mikus, M. (2008). Strategies, Meanings and Actor-networks: Community-based Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Development in the Comoros. Unpublished master’s thesis. London School of Economics and Political Science, London.
Porter, L., Stone, J., Legacy, C., Curtis, C., Harris, J., Fishman, E., Kent, J., Mardsen, G., Reardon, L., Stilgoe, J. (2018). The Autonomous Vehicle Revolution: Implications for Planning/The Driverless City?/ Autonomous Vehicles – A Planner’s Response/Autonomous Vehicles: Opportunities, Challenges and the Need for Government Action/Three Signs Autonomous Vehicles Will Not Lead to, Planning Theory & Practice. Routledge, 19(5), 753–778.
Rutland, T., & Aylett, A. (2008). The work of policy: Actor networks, governmentality, and local action on climate change in Portland, Oregon, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(4), 627–646.
Sayes, E. (2014). Actor-Network Theory and methodology: Just what does it mean to say that nonhumans have agency?, Social Studies of Science, 44(1), 134–149.
Schwedes, O. (2011). The Field of Transport Policy: An Initial Approach, German Policy Studies, 7(2), 7–41.
Stilgoe, J. (2018). Machine learning, social learning and the governance of self-driving cars, Social Studies of Science, 48(1), 25–56.
Taeihagh, A., & Lim, H. S. M. (2019). Governing autonomous vehicles: emerging responses for safety, liability, privacy, cybersecurity, and industry risks, Transport Reviews. Taylor & Francis, 39(1), 103–128.
Tschoerner-Budde, C. (2019). Sustainable Mobility in Munich: Exploring the Role of Discourse in Policy Change. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
Wagenaar, H. (2011). Meaning in Action: Interpretation and Dialogue in Policy Analysis. New York: Sharpe.
Winner, L. (1980). ‘Do Artifacts Have Politics?’, Daedalus. The MIT Press, 109(1), 121–136.
Zittoun, P. (2009). Understanding Policy Change as a Discursive Problem, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice. Routledge, 11(1), 65–82.
