An anatomy of hope





Politics of hope, bloch, architecture, theory, practice


‘So, it is the crisis of the idea of revolution. But behind the idea of revolution is the crisis of the idea of another world, of the possibility of, really, another organization of society, and so on. Not the crisis of the pure possibility, but the crisis of the historical possibility of something like that is caught in the facts themselves. And it is a crisis of negation because it is a crisis of a conception of negation which was a creative one.’ (Alain Badiou)

The paper seeks to elaborate on the concept of hope and the possibility of a ‘politics of hope’ that goes beyond negation in relation to contemporary architectural practice. The focus will be on the affective modality of hope, the intra-personal, as opposed to the common understanding of hope as a personal feeling. Following Ernst Bloch’s notion of hope as ‘anticipatory consciousness’, the paper discusses the limitations and potentials of the principle of hope in contemporary spatial practices using Brecht’s dictum ‘something’s missing’ as a starting point for thinking about hope as a cognitive instrument. In a post-modern society, the notion of an ‘outside’ is hardly conceivable. The alternative orders of society imagined are almost invariably mirrors of what already is; these could be called utopias of compensation. At the same time, there has over the last couple of years been a rapid increase in instances of political upheaval, and the words change and hope are heard increasingly often in political discussion, signalling a dynamism as well as an openness in political discussion that goes well beyond the ideologies of the 20th century. Hope is in other words here understood as transformative; the concept is interlinked with the prospect of change. Hope is as an operative concept capable of a double move, simulta-neously being critical and propositional. The critical aspect is implicit in the connection to change; it denotes a desire for a different world than what is. The propositional aspect implies a direction and the exploration of an alternative. Hope in relation to spatial practices is thus concerned with the experimentation along the edge of the current doxai – challenging them and seeking to extend them.





Research article


Bishop, C. (2004). Antagonism and Relational Aesthetics. October, 110. 51-79.

Bloch, E. (1988). Something’s Missing: A Discussion between Ernst Bloch and Theodor W. Adorno on the Contradictons of Utopian Longing. In The Utopian function of art and literature : selected essays. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Bloch, E. (1995). The principle of hope. Vol.1. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Bourriaud, N., Pleasance, S., Woods, F., & Copeland, M. (2002). Relational aesthetics. Dijon: Presses du r el.

Brown, W. (2010). Walled states, waning sovereignty. New York: Zone.

Cauter, L. D. (2004). The capsular civilization : on the city in the age of fear. Rotterdam: NAi publishers.

Certeau, M. d. (2002). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Deleuze, G. (1995). Societies of Control. In Negotiations: 1972-1990. New York: Columbia University Press.

Deleuze, G. (2007). Desire and Pleasure. In D. Lapoujade (Ed.), Two regimes of madness : texts and interviews 1975-1995. New York: Semiotext(e).

Druot, F., Lacaton, A., & Vassal, J.-P. (2007). Plus : La vivienda colectiva ; territorio de excepción = Les grands ensembles de logements ; territoire d’exception = Large-scale housing developments; an exceptional case. Barcelona: Gustavo Gill.

Eco, U. (1989). The Open Work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Fisher III, W. W., Cost, F., Fairey, S., Feder, M., Fountain, E., Stewart, G., et al. (2012). Reflection on the Hope Poster Case. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology. 25(Number 2, Spring 2012).

Forty, A. (1986). Objects of Desire Design and Society 1750-1980. London: Thames & Hudson.

Geuss, R. (1981). The Idea of a Critical Theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Harvey, D. (2000). Spaces of hope. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Hauptmann, D. (2010). Introduction: Architecture & Mind in the Age of Communication and Information. In D. Hauptmann & W. Neidich (Eds.), Cognitive Architecture: From Bio-politics to Noo-politics; Architecture & Mind in the Age of Communication and Information. Delft: 010 Publishers.

Houdt, J. V. (2011). The Crisis of Negation: An Interview with Alain Badiou. continent. 4. 234-238.

Jameson, F. (1995). Is Space Political? In C. C. Davidson (Ed.), Anyplace. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.

Jameson, F. (2004). The Politics of Utopia. New Left Review. 25. 35-54.

Jameson, F. (2007). Archaeologies of the future : the desire called Utopia and other science fictions. London: Verso.

Latour, B., & Weibel, P. (2005). Making things public : atmospheres of democracy : Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.

Lazzarato, M. (2006). The Concepts of Life and the Living in the Societies of Control. In M. Fuglsang & B. M. Sörensen (Eds.), Deleuze and the social. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Levitas, R. (2011). The concept of Utopia. Oxford: Peter Lang.

Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Martin, R. (2006). Moment of Truth. Log. 7. New York: Anyone Corporation.

Massumi, B. (2002). Navigating Movements. Retrieved February 10, 2014, from MOVEMENTS.pdf

McManus, S. (2011). Hope, Fear, and the Politics of Affective Agency. Theory & Event, 14.

Minton, A. (2012). Ground control : fear and happiness in the Twenty-first-century city. London: Penguin.

Nayar, J. (2013). The Politics of Hope and the Other-in-the-World: Thinking Exteriority. Law & Critique, 24(1), 63-85.

Petrescu, D. (2005). Losing Control, Keeping Desire. In P. Blundell Jones, D. Petrescu & J. Till (Eds.), Architecture and participation. London: Taylor & Francis.

Petrescu, D. (2007). How to make a community as well as the space for it. Retrieved December 10, 2014 from MG/pdf/Doina_Petrescu_-2.pdf

Schlesinger, A. M. (1963). The politics of hope. Boston, Mass.: The Riverside Press.

Shouse, E. (2005). Feeling, Emotion, Affect, M/C Journal (Vol. 8).

Thompson, P., & Zizek, S. (2013). The Privatization of Hope: Ernst Bloch and the Future of Utopia (Vol. 8). Durham: Duke University Press.

Thrift, N. (2007). Non-representational theory : space, politics, affect. New York, NY Routledge.

Vogl, J. (2012). Das Gespenst des Kapitals. Zürich: Diphanes. Wallenstein, S.-O. (2010).

Noopolitics, Life and Architecture. In D. Hauptmann & W. Neidich (Eds.), Cognitive Architecture: From

Bio-politics to Noo-politics ; Architecture & Mind in the Age of Communication and Information. Delft: 010 Publishers.

Wallerstein, I. M. (1998). Utopistics, or, Historical choices of the twenty-first century. New York: New Press.