Downloads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt.2015.01.006Keywords:
Commons, Institutionalisation, insurgenceAbstract
The paper gives a critical account of the recent Italian debate on Commons concentrating on some theoretical problems, with reference to two different components: the economic research on the Commons, the juridical research on the property nature of Commons. It then puts them in parallel with the social demands arisen, articulated around the buzzword “Commons”. The mutual relationship among these components is analysed, stressing the generative aspects of the encounter between scholarship on one hand and the social, discursive use of the Commons concept on the other hand. Finally a research agenda based on the results of such analysis is proposed in order to re-compose the mentioned duality and partially overcome the difficulties that today harness the Italian debate on the Commons and its possible applications in urban planning.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Michele Vianello
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Agrawal, A., (2001). Common Property Institutions and Sustainable Governance of Resources, World Development, 29 (10): 1649-1672.
Asamblea Constituyente, (2008). Constituci n de la Rep blica de Ecuador, Quito: Asamblea Nacional.
Asamblea Legislativa Plurinacional, (2010). Ley 071 de Derechos de la Madre Tierra, La Paz: Asamblea Legislativa Plurinacional de Bolivia.
Bailey., S. & Mattei, U., (2013). Social Movements as Costituent Power: the Italian Struggle for the Commons, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20, (2): article 14. Retrieved April 12, 2015, http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ijgls/vol20/iss2/14
Bennet, O. and Hirst D., (2014). The Forestry Commission and the sale of public forests in England, Standard Note SN/SC/5734, London: Library, House of Commons.
Bersani, S., (2011). Come Abbiamo Vinto il Referendum. Rome: Edizioni Alegre.
Bobbio, N. (2010). Le Consuetudine Come Fatto Normativo. Torino: Giappichelli.
Daher, L. M., (2012). Fare Ricerca sui Movimenti Sociali in Italia: Passato, Presente e Futuro. Milan: Franco Angeli.
De Certeau, M., (2010). L’Invenzione del Quotidiano. Rome: Lavoro.
Ferrajoli, L. (2012). Principia Juris. Bari: Laterza.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research, Qualitative Inquiry, 12 (2): 219-245.
Fondazione Teatro Valle (2013). Statuto fondazione Teatro Valle Bene Comune. Retrieved January 3, 2014, from http://www.teatrovalleoccupato.it/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/STATUTO-FONDAZIONETEATRO-VALLE-BENE-COMUNE.pdf
Grossi, P., (1972). Pagina introduttiva, in Quaderni Fiorentini per la Storia del Pensiero Giuridico Moderno, 1: 1-4.
Grossi, P., (1976). Tradizioni e Modelli nella Sistemazione Post-Unitaria della Proprietà, in Quaderni Fiorentini per il Pensiero Giuridico Moderno, 5-6: 14-338.
Grossi, P. (1977). Un Altro Modo di Possedere. L’Emersione di Forme Alternative di Proprietà alla Coscienza Giuridica Post-unitaria. Milan: Giuffrè.
Hardt, M., & Negri, A., (2000). Empire. London: Harvard University Press.
Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. London: Verso Books.
Lefebvre, H. (1970). La Révolution Urbaine. Paris: Gallimard.
Lefebvre, H. (1996). Right to the City, In Kofman, E. & Lebas, E. (eds.) Writings on Cities. Oxford: Blackwell.
Maddalena, P. (2014). Il territorio Bene Comune degli Italiani. Rome: Donzelli.
Mannoni, L., (1990). Per una “Preistoria” della Funzione Amministrativa, Cultura Giuridica e Attivit dei Pubblici Apparati nell’Et del Tardo Diritto Comune, Quaderni Fiorentini per il Pensiero Giuridico Moderno, 19: 323-504.
Mattei, U. (2011). Beni Comuni. Un Manifesto. Bari: Laterza.
Mattei, U., Reviglio, E., & Rodota’, S. (2007). Invertire la Rotta. Idee per una Riforma della Proprietà Pubblica. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Marotta, S., (2013). La Via Italiana ai Beni Comuni. Aedon, 1: 1-10 . Retrieved April 12, 2015, http://www.aedon.mulino.it/archivio/2013/1/marotta.htm.
Mazzoni, D., & Cicognani, E., (2013). Water as a Commons : An Exploratory Study on the Motives for Collective Action Among Italian Water Movement Activists. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 23: 314-330.
Ministero di Grazia e Giustizia (2007), Commissione Rodot - per la modifica delle norme del codice civile in materia di beni pubblici (14 giugno 2007) – Relazione, Rome, Ministero di Grazia e Giustizia.
Olson, M., (1971). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Harvard University Press.
Ostrom, E., (1990). Governing the Commons, the Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, E., (2008). Design Principles of Robust Property Rights Institutions: What Have We Learned?. Cambridge: MA Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Land Policies and Property Rights Workshop
Presidência da República, República Federativa do Brasil, (2001). lei 10.257, 10-07-2001, Retrieved September 8, 2014, http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/leis_2001/l10257.htm
Ruiz-Ballesteros, E., & Gual, M. A., (2012). The Emergence of New Commons. Human Ecology. 40: 847-862.
Rodot , S., (2013). Il Terribile Diritto, Studi sulla Propriet e i Beni Comuni. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Soja, E. W., (2010). Seeking Spatial Justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Vitale, E., (2013). Contro I Beni Comuni, Una Critica Illuminista. Bari: Laterza.
Yin, R. K., (1985). Case Study Research, Design and Methods. London: Sage.
