Robert A. Beauregard, Planning Matter: Acting with Things, University of Chicago Press, 2015; ISBN: 978-0-226-29739-2; 256 pp.

Authors

Downloads

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt.2018.06.003

Abstract

In Planning Matter Robert Beauregard explores the contribution of actor-network theory (ANT) to the study and practice of planning. This is a difficult task since ANT is not a theory in the traditional sense, that can be applied to phenomena and render explanations. Perhaps, it is best described as a method that informs a relational understanding of specific situations. It is also a tricky task because it implies seeing a modern discipline through the lens of a literature that claims ‘we have never been modern’ (Latour, 1993). Beauregard (1989; 1991) has long grappled with the tension between post-modern theory and modern planning, and in this book, he concentrates on a non-modern challenge. Instead of a seemingly head-on collision (Chapter 1), the book describes a productive encounter that provides insight into planning’s post-modern tensions. ANT can inspire planners ‘[to] become moral agents deeply entangled with the material world’ (p. 226) and, in an unexpected manner, help modern planning to become relevant again today.

Published

2018-07-01

Issue

Section

Book review

References

Beauregard, R.A. (1989). Between modernity and postmodernity: the ambiguous position of US planning. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 7, 381 – 395. https://doi.org/10.1068/d070381.

Beauregard, R.A. (1991). Without a Net: Modernist Planning and the Postmodern Abyss. Journal of Planning Education and Research 10, 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X9101000305.

Boelens, L. (2009). The Urban Connection: an actor-relational approach to urban planning. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers.

Callon, M. (1984). Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. The Sociological Review 32, 196–233.

Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In Bijker, W. & Law, J. (eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change, pp. 225–258. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cam bridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (2004). Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern. Critical Inquiry 30, 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1086/421123.

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Murdoch, J. (2005). Post-structuralist Geography: A Guide to Relational Space. London: SAGE.

Rydin, Y. (2014). The challenges of the “material turn” for planning studies. Planning Theory & Practice 0, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2014.968007.