Implementing social sustainability in area development projects in the Netherlands





area development, social sustainability, implementation, urban governance


During recent decades, urbanization processes and changing population compositions in European cities have underlined the relevance of social sustainability for urban development. Despite a growing amount of research on the social sphere of sustainability, the actual implementation of social sustainability in area development projects remains problematic. In the Netherlands, as in most other European countries, area development is understood as an interdisciplinary practice that strives to integrate strategies, activities and interests of public and private actors into perceived sustainable projects. If area development projects are considered as acts of policy implementation, two questions rise: 1) How are social sustainability dimensions planned, operationalized and implemented through area development projects? and 2) How are they related to governance configurations and mechanisms that relate to decision-making and interventions in these area development projects? The main aim of this paper is to construct a theoretically informed analytical approach to be further developed and applied in PhD research about the implementation of perceived “social sustainability” in area development projects in the Netherlands. We conclude that the implementation of social sustainability in area development projects is a governance process that requires political interventions in a market-driven society and hypothesize that the outcomes of social sustainability in area development are dependent on various aspects of this governance process.




Ansell, C., & Torfing, J. (2016). Handbook on Theories of Governance. Cheltenham UK, Northampton USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.

BNR Webredactie. (2019). PBL: Bouw miljoen woningen in gevaar door besluiteloos kabinet Retrieved May 12, 2020, from

Boström, M. (2012). A missing pillar? Challenges in theorizing and practicing social sustainability: introduction to the special issue. Sustainability: Science, practice and policy, 8(1), 3-14. DOI: 10.1080/15487733.2012.11908080

Bramley, G., Dempsey, N., Power, S., & Brown, C. (2006). What is ‘social sustainability’, and how do our existing urban forms perform in nurturing it? Paper presented at the Planning research conference, London.

CBS. (2019). Aantal daklozen sinds 2009 meer dan verdubbeld. Retrieved May 12, 2020, from

Chiu, R. L. (2003). 12 Social sustainability, sustainable development and housing development. In Housing and social change: East-west perspectives (Vol. 221): Routledge.

Daamen, T. (2019). Praktijkleerstoel verbindt maatschappelijke opgaven. Retrieved May 12, 2020, from

Daamen, T., & Janssen, C. (2019). Wat, waar en voor wie bouwen we? Anticiperen op demografische trends in gebiedsontwikkeling. Gebiedsontwikkeling.krant, 2(2), 1-2. Accessed from

Davidson, M. (2010). Social sustainability and the city. Geography Compass, 4(7), 872-880. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.

Dempsey, Brown, C., & Bramley, G. (2012). The key to sustainable urban development in UK cities? The influence of density on social sustainability. Progress in Planning, 77, 89-141. DOI: 10.1016/j.progress.2012.01.001

Dixon, T., & Woodcraft, S. (2013). Creating strong communities – measuring social sustainability in new housing development. Town & Country Planning, 82(11), 473-480.

Eizenberg, E., & Jabareen, Y. (2017). Social sustainability: A new conceptual framework. Sustainability, 9(1), 68. DOI: 10.3390/su9010068

Elander, I., & Gustavsson, E. (2019). From policy community to issue networks: Implementing social sustainability in a Swedish urban development programme. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 0(0), 1-20. DOI: 10.1177/2399654418820077.

Engbersen, G., Snel, E., & Boom, J. d. (2007). De adoptie van wijken. Rotterdam: Erasmus Universiteit/ RISBO Contractresearch.

Fainstein, S. (2005). Planning theory and the city. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25(2), 121-130. 10.1177/0739456X05279275.

Fainstein, S., & DeFilippis, J. (2015). Readings in planning theory. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons. Franzen, A., Hobma, F., de Jonge, H., & Wigmans, G. (2011). Management of Urban Development

Processes in the Netherlands: Governance, Design, Feasibility. Amsterdam: Technepress. Gemeente Amsterdam. (2018). Een nieuwe lente en een nieuw geluid. Amsterdam: Gemeente Amsterdam.

Gemeente Den Haag. (2018). Den Haag, Stad van kansen en ambities. Den Haag: Gemeente Den Haag.

Gemeente Rotterdam. (2018). Nieuwe energie voor Rotterdam. Rotterdam: Gemeente Rotterdam. Gemeente Utrecht. (2018). Ruimte voor iedereen. Utrecht: Gemeente Utrecht.

Goodson, L., Thomas, S., Phillimore, J., & Pemberton, S. (2017). Mass migration and real estate in European cities. London.

Gressgård, R. (2015). The Power of (Re)Attachment in Urban Strategy: Interrogating the Framing of Social Sustainability in Malmö. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 47(1), 108-120. DOI: 10.1068/a130167p.

Harvey, D. (2003). The right to the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(4), 939-941. DOI: 10.1111/j.0309-1317.2003.00492.x.

Jessop, B. (2002). Liberalism, neoliberalism and urban governance: a state-theoretical perspective. Antipode, 34(3), 452-472. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8330.00250.

Knight Frank Research. (2018). European Cities Report 2018. London

Kooiman, N., Jong, A. d., Huisman, C., Duin, C. v., & Stoeldraijer, L. (2016). PBL/CBS Regionale bevolkings- en huishoudensprognose 2016–2040: sterke regionale verschillen. Den Haag: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek.

Koppenjan, J. F. M., & Enserink, B. (2009). Public–Private Partnerships in Urban Infrastructures: Reconciling Private Sector Participation and Sustainability. Public Administration Review, 69(2), 284-296. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.01974.x

Langergaard, L. L. (2019). Interpreting ‘the social’: Exploring processes of social sustainability in Danish nonprofit housing. Local Economy, 34(5), 456-470. DOI: 10.1177/0269094219846626

Lennartz, C. (2018). De omvang en prognoses van “het” woningtekort. Retrieved January 25, 2019, from

Maloutas, T. (2003). Promoting social sustainability The case of Athens. City, 7(2), 167-181. DOI: 10.1080/1360481032000136732

McKenzie, S. (2004). Social sustainability: towards some definitions. Hawke Research Institute Working Paper Series. Magill, Australia.

Missimer, M., Robèrt, K.-H., & Broman, G. (2016). A strategic approach to social sustainability e Part 1: exploring the social system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140(2017), 32-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.170

Musterd, S., Marcińczak, S., van Ham, M., & Tammaru, T. (2017). Socioeconomic segregation in European capital cities. Increasing separation between poor and rich. Urban Geography, 38(7), 1062-1083. doi:10.1080/02723638.2016.1228371

Permentier, M., Kullberg, J., & Noije, L. v. (2013). Werk aan de wijk. Den Haag: Sociaal Cultureel Planbureau.

Polèse, M., & Stren, R. E. (2000). The social sustainability of cities: Diversity and the management of change. Canada: University of Toronto Press.

Rashidfarokhi, Yrjänä, L., Wallenius, M., Toivonen, S., Ekroos, A., & Viitanen, K. (2018). Social sustainability tool for assessing land use planning processes. European Planning Studies, 26(6), 1269-1296. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2018.1461811

Redactie (2019). Hoogleraar Gebiedsontwikkeling: afspraken Rijk en G4 hebben meer richting nodig. Retrieved May 12, 2020, from

Shirazi, M. R., & Keivani, R. (2019). The triad of social sustainability: Defining and measuring social sustainability of urban neighbourhoods. Urban Research & Practice, 12(4), 448-471. DOI: 10.1080/17535069.2018.1469039

Torfing, J., Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., & Sørensen, E. (2012). Interactive governance: Advancing the paradigm: Oxford University Press on Demand.

Vallance, S., Harvey, C. P., & Dixon, E. J. (2009). What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts. Geoform, 42(2011), 342–348. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.01.002

Van Bueren, E. M., Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. (2003). Dealing with wicked problems in networks: Analyzing an environmental debate from a network perspective. Journal of public administration research and theory, 13(2), 193-212. DOI: 10.1093/jpart/mug017

Van Bueren, E. M., Van Bueren, E. T. L., & Van der Zijpp, A. J. (2014). Understanding wicked problems and organized irresponsibility: challenges for governing the sustainable intensification of chicken meat production. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 8, 1-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.06.002

Vranken, J., De Decker, P., & Van Nieuwenhuyze, I. (2003). Social Inclusion, Urban Governance and Sustainability: Towards a Conceptual Framework for the UGIS Research Project (Vol. 1): Garant. UGIS collection.

Weingartner, C., & Moberg, A. (2014). Exploring Social Sustainability: Learning from Perspectives on Urban Development and Companies and Products. Sustainable Development, 22(204), 122-133. DOI: 10.1002/sd.536

Woodcraft, S. (2012). Social Sustainability and New Communities: Moving from concept to practice in the UK. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 68(2012), 29-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.204

Woodcraft, S., Bacon, N., Caistor-Arendar, L., & Hackett, T. (2012). Design for Social Sustainability: a framework for creating thriving new communities. London: Social Life

Woodcraft, S. (2016). Reconfiguring the “social” in sustainable development: community, citizenship and innovation in new urban neighbourhoods. Envisioning Sustainabilities: Towards an Anthropology of Sustainability. Newcastle upon Tyne (UK): Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future: United Nations.