What is it, and what is the matter?
Downloads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/65Keywords:
Urban Living Lab (ULL), urban experimentation, open innovation, living laboratoryAbstract
The research agenda for urban innovation and experimentation seems to find new momentum in recent times. The recent emergence of Urban Living Lab (ULL) is an example demonstrating such a trend. Against this background, this paper begins with the interest in clarifying what ULL is. Various sources offer many definitions of ULL, but these definitions often contain other ill-defined concepts. This paper questions the ambiguity of temporality and spatiality that is contained by ULL’s emphasis on ‘real’ time and environment. There seems also oversimplification of ULL’s origin, which potentially hinders further in-depth investigation into its non-linear and complex emergence. The reflection on the political context indicates that political drivers of ULL may be hidden behind the immediate attention to its definitions and popular perceptions. The wide range of different empirical ULL cases in the UK arguably reflects the ambiguity of its meaning. Therefore, this paper suggests re-thinking about ULL and its emergence. The attempts to summarise and simplify ULL cannot effectively clarify its complexity in nature. Well-constructed questions can take ULL as a promising opportunity to enhance and materialise long-lasting sociological enquiries.
Published
Issue
Section
References
Addie, J. (2017). From the urban university to universities in urban society. Regional Studies, 51(7): 1089-1099. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1224334
Allmendinger, P. (2017). Planning Theory, 3rd edition. London: Palgrave.
Almirall, E. & Wareham, J. (2011). Living labs: arbiters of mid- and ground-level innovation. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 233(1): 87-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2011.537110
Bajgier, S., Maragah, H, Saccucci, M., Verzilli, A. & Prybutok, V. (1991). Introducing students to community operations research by using a city neighbourhood as a living laboratory. Operations Research, 39(5): 701-709. DOI: https://www.jstor.org/stable/171200
Bulkeley, H., Coenen, L., Frantzeskaki, N., Hartmann, C., Kronsell, A., Mai, L., Marvin, S., McCormick, K., van Steenbergen, F. & Voytenko Palgan, Y. (2016). Urban living labs: governing urban sustainability transitions. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 22: 13-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.02.003
Bulkeley, H., Marvin S., Voytenko Palgan Y., McCormick, K., Breitfuss-Loidl, M., Mai, L., von Wirth, T. & Frantzeskaki, N. (2019). Urban living laboratories: Conducting the experimental city? European Urban and Regional Studies, 26(4):317-335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776418787222
Chron er, D., St hlbr st, A., & Habibipour, A. (2019) Urban Living Labs: towards an integrated understanding of their key components. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(3): 50-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1224
Durrant, R., Barnes, J., Kern, F. & Mackerron, G. (2018). The acceleration of transitions to urban sustainability: a case study of Brighton and Hove. European Planning Studies, 26(8): 1537-1558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1489783
Dutilleul, B., Birrer, F. & Mensink. W. (2010). Unpacking European living labs: analysing innovation’s social dimensions. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 4(1): 60–85.
Eriksson, M., Niitamo, V. & Kulkki, S. (2005). State-of-art in utilizing Living Labs approach to user-centric ICT innovation - a European approach. Retrieved August 27, 2020, from (Semantic Scholar): https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/State-ofthe-art-in-utilizing-Living-Labs-approach- Eriksson/2edd5e0fef9f7f9fd0262dea937cb997b3ab8d5f
Ersoy, A. & van Bueren, E. (2020). Challenges of Urban Living Labs towards the Future of Local Innovation. Urban Planning, 5(4): 89-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i4.3226
Evans, J. (2011). Resilience, ecology and adaptation in the experimental city. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36(2011): 223-237. DOI: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23020814
Evans, J., Bulkeley, H., Voytenko, Y., McCormick, K. & Curtis, S. (2018). Circulating experiments: urban living labs and the politics of sustainability. In: K. Ward, A. Jonas, B. Miller & D. Wilson (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook on Spaces of Urban Politics (pp. 416-425). London: Routledge.
Evans, J., Jones, R., Karvonen, A., Millard, L. & Wendler, J. (2015). Living labs and co-production: university campuses as platforms for sustainability science. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 16(2015): 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.06.005
Evans, J. & Karvonen, A. (2014). ‘Give me a laboratory and I will lower your carbon footprint!’ - urban laboratories and the governance of low-carbon futures. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(2): 413-430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12077
Franz, Y., Tausz, K., & Thiel, S. (2015). Contextuality and co-creation matter: a qualitative case study comparison of living lab concepts in urban research. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(12): 48-55. DOI: http://timreview.ca/article/952
Jacobs, J., Cairns, S. & Strebel, I. (2007). ‘A tall storey ... but, a fact just the same’: the Red Road High-rise as a black box. Urban Studies, 44(3): 609-629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980601131910
Keith, M. & Headlam, N. (2017). Comparative International Urban and Living Labs. Retrieved August 27, 2020, from https://www.urbantransformations.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/Comparative-International-and- Urban-Living-Labs-%E2%80%93-The-Urban-Living-Global-Challenge-A-Prospectus.pdf
Kronsell, A. & Mukhtar-Landgren, D. (2018). Experimental governance: the role of municipalities in urban living labs. European Planning Studies, 26(5): 988-1007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1435631
Latour, B. (1983). Give me a laboratory and I will raise the world. In K. Knorr-Cetina & M. Mulkay (Ed.), Science Observed (pp. 141-170). London: Sage Publications.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: an Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Markopoulos, P. & Rauterberg, G. (2000). LivingLab: a White Paper. IPO Annual Progress Report, 35, 53–65. Retrieved August 27, 2020, from (ResearchGate) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/2406991_Livinglab_A_White_Paper
Marvin, S. & Silver, J. (2016). The urban laboratory and emerging sites of urban experimentation. In: J. Evans, A. Karvonen & R. Raven (Ed.), The Experimental City (pp. 47-60). London: Routledge.
Perry, B. (2006). Science, society and the university: a paradox of values. Social Epistemology, 20(3-4): 201-219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02691720600879798
Powells, G. & Blake, L. (2016). Urban science networks and local economy: the case of Newcastle upon Tyne. In: J. Evans, A. Karvonen & R. Raven (Ed.), The Experimental City (pp.137-149). London: Routledge.
Puerari, E., de Koning, J., von Wirth, T., Karre, P., Mulder, I. & Loorbach, D. (2018). Co-creation dynamics in urban living labs. Sustainability, 10(2018), 1893 (published online). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061893
Rydin, Y. (2012). Using Actor-Network Theory to understand planning practice: exploring relationships between actants in regulating low-carbon commercial development. Planning Theory, 12(1): 23-45.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095212455494
Schliwa, G. & McCormick, K. (2016). Living labs: users, citizens and transitions. In: J. Evans, A. Karvonen & R. Raven (Ed.), The Experimental City (pp.163-178). London: Routledge.
Schumacher, J. & Feurstein, K. (2008). Living Labs - the user as co-creator. Retrieved August 27, 2020, from (ResearchGate) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266881950_Living_Labs_-_the_User_as_Co- Creator
Schuurman, D. (2015). Bridging the Gap between Open and User Innovation? Exploring the Value of Living Labs as Means to Structure User Contribution and Manage Distributed Innovation. PhD thesis, Ghent & Brussels, Belgium: Ghent University & Vrije Universiteit Brussel.
Schuurman, D., de Marez, L. & Ballon, P. (2013). Open innovation processes in living lab innovation systems: insights from the LeYLab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(11): 28-36.
Schuurman, D., de Moor, K., de Marez, L., Evens, T. (2011). A living lab research approach for mobile TV. Telematics and Informatics, 28(2011): 271-282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2010.11.004
Sharp, D. & Salter, R. (2017). Direct impacts of an urban living lab from the participants’ perspective: Livewell Yarra. Sustainability, 9(2017), 1699 (published online). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101699
Steen, K. & van Bueren, E. (2017). The defining characteristics of urban living labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(7): 21-33. DOI: 10.22215/timreview/1088
Veeckman, C., Schuurman, D., Leminen, S. & Westerlund, M. (2013). Linking living lab characteristics and their outcomes: towards a conceptual framework. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(12): 6-15.
von Wirth, T., Fuenfschilling, L., Frantzeskaki, N. & Coenen, L. (2019). Impacts of urban living labs on sustainability transitions: mechanisms and strategies for systemic change through experimentation. European Planning Studies, 27(2): 229-257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1504895
Voytenko, Y., McCormick, K., Evans, J. & Schliwa, G. (2016). Urban living labs for sustainability and low carbon cities in Europe: towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123: 45-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.053
